Court Releases Report On Sharon Stone Case

The court who handed down the decision that Sharon Stone could not move her 8-year-old son Roan to LA has released a “Tentative Statement of Decision,” which outlines a bitter, ongoing battle between Stone and ex-husband, Phil Bronstein. According to the judge who denied Sharon’s request, Sharon is “an alarmist who has gone off the deep end over and over.”

The statement says that “Mother appears to overreact to many medical issues involving Roan.” In one case, the judge describes Stone believing Roan had a spinal condition, but “there was no evidence to support this allegation.”

“Another example of an overreaction is that Mother suggested that Roan should have Botox injections in his feet to resolve a problem he had with foot odor. As Father appropriately noted, the simple and common sense approach of making sure Roan wore socks with his shoes and used foot deodorant corrected the odor problem without the need for any invasive procedure on this young child.”

Click below to read more excerpts from the report.

The statement goes on to say,

“Father has championed for Roan’s well-being out of, what appears to this Court, nothing less than the unconditional love for his son. Unfortunately, and for unexplained reasons, it appears that Mother did not involve herself to the extent she could or should have in this process … Mother has attempted to put up roadblocks to Roan’s getting help, or has decided against participating in his care. Unfortunately, the problem caused by Mother’s overreactions is painfully real for this child.”

And, responding to Sharon’s argument that she put her career on hold for Roan,

“If Mother has, in fact, limited her career to make herself available for Roan, she has done little to make this evident to Roan, his school or this Court.”

Source: TMZ

Photo: Flynet 9/28

Filed under: Sharon Stone

3 Comments »»

Post a Comment

  1. Wow that is harsh. I don’t understand why they made this information public, I believe it should have stayed private.

    Reply
  2. Kate

    In my country, dealings with the family court are strictly confidential – in the interests of the well-being and privacy of the child. It’s certainly good gossip, but I can’t believe it was relased to the public!! That’s insane. Poor kid.

    Reply
  3. Sanja

    I agree, this shoul not have been made public for Roan’s sake!

    But, if she’s such a bad mother to Roan why aren’t her other two sons being protected? What, they don’t have a father so who cares what their life is like!?

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>