Violet & Grandma Feed The Ducks

Jan 20, 2009 by JENNY SCHAFER
Violet & Grandma Feed The Ducks

Violet Affleck spends the day with her grandmother, Chris Affleck, at the park feeding a flock of ducks some bread.

We've also seen Grandma Affleck picking up Violet from preschool. She must be in town helping out Ben and Jen who just welcomed their second daughter, Seraphina.

Photos: MO/bauergriffinonline.com


Other Links


 18 Comments

said:

Violet is soo cute! I love the picture when she is laying down :)
Can't wait to meet little Seraphina

Julita said:

wow, i almost forgot that Violet CAN walk ;) i mean we just tend to see her always carried around..
i loove these pictures!!!

Janie said:

She is soooo cute!!

cat said:

That's so gross. She is not even with her celebrity parents and the paparazzi are taking her picture. It's one thing to take her picture when she is with her parents, but she is by her self with her grandma. It's gone too far with the paparazzi. Just disgusting.

shirilicious said:

I know this is an unpopular topic when it comes to the Garner-Afflecks, but cat, this is what happens when you don't care enough to shield your child from the paparazzis, The kid becomes a celebrity on its own.

Kirsty said:

Wow, she looks so much older than three! Those pictures are lovely, but I agree that it's terrible that they can't even feed the ducks without being followed by the papparazzi.

Emily said:

Lovely pictures!

cat said:

shirilicious, There is absolutely nothing you can do to protect your children from paparazzi. You cant expect these celebrities to lock up their babies in their homes. They need and deserve a normal life as well. It's the paparazzi who need to have some respect and back off when it comes to the children. Yes the parents are in the public eye and it's not illegal to photograph them, but these babies are not actors. There needs to be some boundaries on what is right and what is not. And this is simply not right. She is three years old. It's disturbing that these grown men and women can take these pictures, and it's not considered stalking.

tess said:

like I said before. SHE is the most cute celeb tot ever. this pics are absolutely adorable, and Violet is the perfect mini-me of her mom. can't wait to see Seraphina, she must be gorgeous like her big sister and parents.

thanks for the lovely pictures.

Jennie said:

If it is impossible to shield your children from the paps, why did we not see Emmeline Bale until she was 3?????

I applaud Christian Bale for managing to stay so private.

shirilicious said:

Jennie, exactly! And there are so many other celebs living in LA who all manage to escape the paps to a certain extent, why not Jen G.?
Cat, I completely agree with you, paparazzi should have some boundaries when it comes to children, especially if their not with their famous parents. I know, quite the hypocrisy stating that on a site called celebrity baby scoop ;-).

melanie said:

well no duh julita, if your life was always invaded by the crazy paps wouldn't you carry your 3-year-old?

Sarita said:

No I wouldn't carry my child because of papperazzi. they are just people. Some people are acting as if paps are out to kidnap children.

They do this job because it brings them money, people that think the paps should stop taking photos of children should stop going to sites like this. By looking at the photos you are paying the paps!

I like looking at these photos and I know that makes the paps go out to take the photos.

Julita said:

no melanie, of course, probably sometimes i would, but there've been maaany pictures posted of Violet with parents, even from a big distance and she is always carried, and also - a 3 year old carried around is too old for that, i just wouldnt do it so much so that my child doesnt get used to it and then doesnt follow me whinging to carry it

Julita said:

Melanie, compare Violet to little Kingston for example. He's the same age and equally followed by the paparazzis

LuvMyJolie said:

Violet is soo adorable!

The reason we didnt see pics of Emmaline Bale was bcuz pics of her werent paying anything 3 years ago.. Its not that Christian hid her but there just isnt a high demand for her pics as compared to other tots like Violet and Kingston.

Jackie said:

If you look at all the videos of the Affleck family on x17online.com it's quite clear that they let her walk until they get close to the paps and then they pick her up. When they pick her up from preschool in the afternoon she walks to the door of the centre and they pick her up and carry her past the paps to the car.

I don't believe this is because they think the paps will "kidnap" her, it's more that paps are known for their rough behaviour and they will push and shove to get a good shot or get right up in the kid's faces. I think it's fair enough. I don't think they carry her around the house all day long. Sheesh.

melanie said:

understandable julita, everyone obviously has different ways of parenting. i'd carry my girls because you can get around quicker when you're being followed.

and sarita, you have to admit most paparazzi are pretty invasive espescially to those celebs with kids. alot of them run red lights and put themselves and others in danger just to get a photo. don't get me wrong, i love celebs and looking at the photos, i just think they paps can get a little crazy sometimes, i think just about everyone thinks that.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human or a spambot.
15 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Comments are held for moderation before being published.
By leaving a comment you agree to the Terms of Service, including
specifically celebritybabyscoop.com's right to delete comments or otherwise
as set forth in Section 8.