Update: A rep for actor John Travolta and wife Kelly Preston has denied reports that the couple are expecting twin boys. Saying that the reports are “Totally false,” and confirming, “They are not expecting twins.”
See original story below…
John Travolta and Kelly Preston are expecting twin boys, Star reports.
“They were ecstatic when they thought they were having just one baby,” an insider says. “Now that there will be two, they can barely contain their happiness!”
John and Kelly, who are already parents to 10-year-old daughter Ella, lost their 16-year-old son, Jett, when he struck his head during a seizure in January 2009. The couple announced their third pregnancy last week.
Kelly, 47, underwent in vitro fertilization treatments, says the insider, which increases the chances of conceiving twins. Due this fall, Kelly is already busy preparing for their boys. “She’s having the time of her life looking at all the cute little outfits and toys online,” the source adds.
Have my strong doubts about this story considering the source. STAR isn´t the most reliable source since it´s one of the worst rags there is in this world alongside In Touch (aka Out Of Touch) and Life & Style. But I would be really thrilled if this news about twin boys was true. Until John and Kelly confirm this story themselves I really doubt the truth of this story. Whether it´s gonna be one baby or two babies in the Travolta-Preston family the main thing is that the child/children is/are healthy. That´s the most important thing.
I don’t think it’s fair to say they are replacing Jett. If you’ve ever had a miscarriage or a stillborn, then you would know that parents usually want another baby afterward, that doesn’t mean they are replacing the ones they lost. I’m sure nothing could ever replace their son.
I don’t know whether or not to believe STAR, but I knew it! I called that last week!
I am not going to believe it’s twins until the parents-to-be say it themselves.
But Star also broke the news that Kelly was pregnant, so they could be right.
47 and having babies. I think they are replacing Jett. Shame on them.
Um, they were talking about another baby for years before Jett died.
“replacing Jett”….what a horrible thing to say.
yeah exactally kim is right one child never replaces another and multiples are more likely in older mothers weather they use in vitro or not because of ovarian hyper stimulation that occours near the end of a womans fertile years as Kelly is getting close to now
though that thing about couples who miscarry or have a stillborn wanting another child right away isn’t always true some couples that go through that tragedy decide never to try again or wait for a couple of years
YES THEY ARE replacing Jett who cares about their own daughter.. never really did.. it was all about Jett …Hope these babies have the same disease
that Jett had or something else.. Ella does not deserve this at all!! …
They talk as if Ella is not involved at all..!!
Something is seriously wrong with you that you feel so strongly about people you don’t know and a situation you aren’t actually familiar with. Let’s see if this helps you retrieve your sanity: YOU DON’T KNOW THEM. YOU DON’T KNOW THAT THEY ARE “REPLACING” THEIR SON. YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT THEIR RELATIONSHIP IS WITH THEIR DAUGHTER. Get a grip. Stop being a hateful, ignorant person, because all that anger is just going to come back to you tenfold.
That remark makes you sound less than human or just plain childish.
You cannot read their hearts or know what the dynamics of their family are.
wow anonymous. Those are some hateful words. You should be ashamed of yourself!
Oh and any parent knows full well that you can NEVER “replace” a child. If you seriously believe that someone is trying to do that, you must not have children of your own.
if this report is true which i doubt very much but anyways i just wish them a happy healthy baby cause thats all that matters
Hopefully if these boys need medical treatment they’ll get it for them… this time. Poor Jett. He had epilepsy and he was on NO medication to treat it.
Geez, they are old enough to be grandparents. If they were talking about another baby for “years,” why wait until their 16 year old son died?
Why couldn’t they have adopted an older child?
Why should they if they want a biological child of their own. Not everyone is confortable with adoption.
They have been talking about having another baby for years, but sometimes her movie schedules were an issue and who knows, maybe she couldn’t get pregnant for some reason.
I think 47 is too old. Sorry if this offends anyone but its my opinion
Now their rep is saying she is NOT expecting twins. What do they (magazines) do, just think up a story out of thin air?
is it come from unnaturally??
Twins are relate to DNA,ans she is 47….
i dont konw…..
47 is too old? who cares, they are happy. For God’s sake people, be happy for them, they are, they went thru a major phase that hit them hard, God is blessing them with something they need, with children, with boys, they lost theirs.. BE HAPPY FOR THEM!!!!!!!!! STOP CRITICIZING!
CONGRATS TO BOTH! I hope her pregnancy is healthy and full term
Their spokesperson came out and said this is completly untrue
Of course they are not having twins.. the next step is that she is not really
pregnant either… Yes you can replace a child that you lost..If you ever had
that happen to you …you know that Jett was the one child in the family…
his sister was just a spare.. who cares about her.. right.. all these photos
of just John and Kelly.. what family..Just the two of them when it should
be the 3 of them.. Tired of this story …hope it has a medical condition too
so that they can’t do anything about it either.
has it ever occoured to you that Ella maybe camera shy but has to do it becuase she wants to be in the family business as many others have Attempted and failed Nell Newman for example granted both of her parents are oscar winning stars and only John has ever been nominated
Love that dress in that pic.
Doesn’t it seem that everyone has an opinion on someone else’s life? I