Heidi Klum Strips Down For GQ

Heidi Klum Strips Down For GQ

Heidi Klum bares all in the new issue of GQ Germany. The model mom poses in her intimates on the magazine’s cover and strips down entirely in the accompanying spread. It’s hard to believe she she has four young kids!

Despite her incredible figure, the 37-year-old German-born beauty recently revealed she too has some postpartum body image concerns:

We all have the same issues. Every woman. It’s thighs, butt, arms, muffintops. All those fun things, we all have the same issues.”

Heidi and her musician husband Seal are parents to kids Leni, 6, Henry, 4, Johan, 3, and Lou, 8 months.

Filed under: Heidi Klum

  • mslewis

    Is this woman ever NOT naked in magazines?? It’s getting boring. It’s as if Heidi is aware she is almost 40 and wants the world to know how good she still looks. But we all know it’s mostly photoshop!!! Maybe her main “issue” is that Karl Lagerfeld once called her fat and homely.

  • Anonymous

    I have no problem with her showing off her body — it’s her job. Sure, she’s good looking, both before and after all the babies.

    …But, this photo looks very strange, especially in the area of her rear end. Is that the back of her right thigh, sticking out behind her butt and other thigh? Maybe there’s something wrong with my eyes, but I just don’t get it. Everything about her body below her elbow looks wrong/manipulated. (Yes, I know that all magazine photos are photo-shopped nowadays, but they should at least be altered in a way that appears anatomically correct!! Aren’t these people professionals??)

    And, her head is ENORMOUS, relative to her hips!!!

    • Anonymous

      She’s wearing a garter belt – maybe that’s why it looks weird?

      • Anonymous

        Oooh, you’re totally right. Thanks! :) I just couldn’t see it on my computer screen with low-resolution…

    • Anonymous

      it’s the garter string that makes that impression, y64 can’t see her other tight

  • Tiffany

    HATERS…….Go on Heidi!

  • Ash

    Seriously? HOW does this have anything to do with BABIES, Celebrity BABY Blog? Maybe we should rename it “another celeb mom who works out with a personal trainer for 8 hours a day and has a personal chef who cooks super great meals for them and has a nanny to watch her kids while she does it”. Eh?

    I think it’s snazzy.

  • Anonymous

    photoshopped much? Her and Giselle are the same…always posing half-naked…I know they are models but leave it to the young ones to do that….they have 1000x money than us and can still model without stripping

  • Hannah.J

    Wow I can’t believe she has given birth to 4 children what an amazing body.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t like her hair shorter like that. What a difference in her looks it makes. It takes away from her sex appeal in my opinion. I’m sure she thinks she looks gorgeous, though.

  • Shirilicious

    @everybody saying, ‘they can’t believe how good she looks’, folks, she is photoshopped beyond belief.
    There was a photo of her and her husband on the beach a couple of weeks ago and while she has a nice figure, you can clearly see that she doesn’t have the body she had pre-babies.
    And having that in mind, I don’t think she looks particularly good here, that hair and make-up make her look way harsh.

  • Anonymous

    Not sure why she’s still taking off her clothes. She should concentrate on different parts of her career than semi-nude modeling. As for the photo, wow it’s so airbrushed, the only part that looks like her is her head. And yet they really cut off her behind.

Latest Dish