Pregnant Victoria Beckham Says She Wants Even More Kids!

Feb 19, 2011 by SHAYLA PERRY
Pregnant Victoria Beckham Says She Wants Even More Kids!

Are Victoria Beckham and husband David Beckham going to keep trying until they get a girl?

It sure sounds like it! The New York Post reports that in an interview with CNN airing Saturday (February 19), the 36-year-old former pop star turned fashion icon tells Alina Cho, "[If I] don't have a girl this time, then maybe I'll be lucky enough to have a girl next time."

Victoria is currently pregnant with her fourth child and does not yet know the sex of the baby.

Though the mom of three (going on 4) tells CNN that she'd like to add a girl to the Beckham brood, and isn't opposed to having five children, she does have a limit.

"Well, I'm not Angelina. I don't know. I mean, come on," Beckham told Cho.

What do you think? Will baby #4 be the last for the Beckham family?

Photos: Flynet

Other Links


 35 Comments

Ashley said:

I'm very happy for Victoria and David, and if they can afford to have a bunch of kids and make sure those kids are loved and well cared for, more power to them. But I really think it's this mindset of "try until we get a girl/boy" is part of the reason why there's so much overpopulation as it is.

I mean, be happy with what you get. If you get all boys, that's how it was meant to be. If you get all girls, that's how it was meant to be.

Anonymous said:

I totally agreed with you. Well said :)

Victoria said:

That's not the reason for overpopulation

Anonymous said:

she said 'part of the reason' not the single sole factor. and she is right, it is part of the reason.

Victoria said:

No it is not, so you and the other Anonymous can stop saying that it is.

Tara said:

The only "problem" with over population is those women who choose to keep reproducing despite not being to financially support them. They use them as pawns for assistance. In turn they become a burden to tax payers to cover their excessive of abuse of resources such as welfare and federal Medicaid.

If you can afford to have kids who are you to say what they should and should
not do?

Anonymous said:

I would be more concerned with having mutiple c-sections and the risks, rather than getting myself a girl. But that's me.

Victoria said:

I believe Victoria has stated that all three boys, Brooklyn, Romeo, & Cruz were breech and since she had a csection, they obviously didn't turn down in time, & though there are some kids who've been born breech, it's not particularly safe to deliver a baby breech. But I agree this being the 4th child and having 3 csections before, she most likely has alot of scar tissue and it's harder to heal after so many. I believe (or at least in my mind it would make sense) that her doctor will most likely urge her to try giving birth naturally, if the baby is not born breech, and avoid the csection unless there's an emergency.

Anonymous said:

Maybe she is pretty sure it's a girl, so she really knows she isn't going to try for a fifth child just to throw people off.

Anonymous said:

how the hell does she stay so damn skinny!

Anonymous said:

thats what id like to know! haha

Anonymous said:

So ....she won't be "lucky" if the baby turns out to be a boy? Geez poor kid if it's a boy.

Anonymous said:

lol i know..

Anonymous said:

They'll try for more until they have a football team at home

Allison said:

I dont see any problem with what she said. If I had three boys, I'd be saying the exact same thing. I'd love all the boys, obviously, but I've always wanted daughters more than sons. Doesnt mean I dont love the boys.

Anonymous said:

She's said multiple times she's be thrilled to have another boy! That was probably just a piece Of the entire interview

Anonymous said:

If she's so bent on getting a daughter, maybe she should try some other guy... The sex of the baby is determined by the father. Maybe Becks' spermcells are all boys..... ;-)

Trudi said:

Where is she pregnat?

Cary said:

This was just a piece Of the entire interview if you go to CNN website you can watch the full video interview.

Cary said:

This was just a piece Of the entire interview if you go to CNN website you can watch the full video interview.

vivien leigh said:

if it is a boy at the beginning, i suppose, every normal person wants the next to be girl, not because this person hates boys after knowing his own child, but because has a boy already, now something different. But if its a boy, who the hell would throw his child away? Who the hell wont love his own kid? And after knowing its charm...you r helpless, cant help but love it. But after 3 boys who the hell would say: i try for a boy, if now its a girl, may be next time ill be lucky and have finally a boy. What shes sayin is very, very normal. Shes tryin so hard for a girl- 3th time. Maybe shell be blessed this time. With the girl she wants so much.

Julianne said:

I hope this time be a girl
They make beutiful kids
Congrats to the family ..
Waiting for the name :)

Helen said:

the more boys you have, the higher the chances are of having a boy again versus having a girl.

Anonymous said:

thanks .

Anonymous said:

thanks .

JULIEB said:

Her mentality makes me think that the kids she's having till the girl arrives are insignificant. People take healthy kids for granted. Also she's 36 so who knows if she'll be as fertile in the future. I have one of each so I don't know what it is like to want one gender and not have it, but I can tell you my son is as much my whole life as is my daughter; I don't prefer one over the other.

ReadCarefully said:

She DID NOT say that she hates her boys, or more particularly, her 2 boys after Brooklyn, did she?? Why do you have to read her statement with BLIND hate? She said if she doesn't get a girl this time she MIGHT still try for another baby to get a girl. BUT, if it turns out that the 5th baby is also a boy, she will STOP at that and won't ever try it again. And yes..for YOU to say hatefull, bad things about her wanting to have a girl after getting 3 boys really makes you a judgmental person WITHOUT knowledge about it at all! IT's so easy for you to say because you have both sexes of children. I bet if you have all girls or all boys, you WILL be saying the same thing as wanting to have another gender for a change IF there's a chance for you to have it. Doesn't mean you DON'T LOVE all of your children, does it??

Anonymous said:

Thank you! Someone with some knowledge. Victoria ADORES her children and would adore another boy also.

Anonymous said:

wtf she doesn't prefer one over the other, people usually want one of each it doesn't mean if you have both the same gender it bad or worse it's just cool to have best of both worlds and also if you have 3 boys already and you're the only female in the family you probably have always dreamed of a little girl but just that doesn't mean you love your first children any less it just means you have them already and already love them with all your heart and now you just want maybe the opposite gender in your family and have the best of both worlds both gender children while raising your family, you're children and you can experience both brothers and sisters.

Nat said:

Helen, that is not true. Each pregnancy has 50% chance of being a girl and 50% chance of being a boy - it doesn't matter the sex of your other children

Anonymous said:

AcTually, if all the other children are same sex and are from the same two biological parents, there is a much greater chance the baby will be the exact gender as the previous. It's not necessarily a 50/50 chance. Since the y chromosome is determined by the father there is not a balanced chance.

Nat said:

There is a balanced chance because the man carries approximately the same amount of y sperm as x sperm.

Janet said:

Have to agree with anonymous. I am a research analyst for pfizer, there is certainly a predisposition for the male sperm to carry more x or y determinates. These are factored in each male as his testes and scrotum sac mature ( sorry to be graphic).
No science or human physiological system are ever carbon copies so there are various possible outcomes, but scientifically speaking there is a pattern.

Janet said:

Ps. Sorry nat I hope I am not dashing any hopes you may have if you are currently expecting as I stated there is nothing that is absolute but medically and biologically speaking if there are more than 3 children and all are same sex, the ratio of having that same gender again, without any "tampering", balance out to 80/20.
I have 4 girls. My sister in law has 5 girls (she is married to my husbands brother) and my husband is one of 7 boys.

Anonymous said:

Not true Janet, there is no proven evidence that a man carries more y or x sperm, there is always 50/50 chance.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human or a spambot.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Comments are held for moderation before being published.
By leaving a comment you agree to the Terms of Service, including
specifically celebritybabyscoop.com's right to delete comments or otherwise
as set forth in Section 8.