Rachel Zoe’s Pampered Prince

Rachel Zoe's Pampered  Prince

You’re never too young for your first Gucci, right?

That’s exactly the thoughts of celebrity stylist and new mom, Rachel Zoe. The 39-year-old fashionista has spared no expense when it comes to donning her four-month-old son, Skyler, in the most extravagant and fashionable frocks on the market today.

On a Wednesday episode of Nightline, the new mom took ABC journalist, Juju Chang on a tantalizing tour of her son’s high end walk in closet.

The marvelous mama proudly showed off Skyler’s $1,160 Gucci bomber jacket, his $3,700 shoe collection and his $1,400 Hermes blanket (let’s hope he doesn’t spit up on it).

Although the lucky lad may have a better wardrobe than most babies his age, Rachel is less than impressed with the lack of selection in boy’s clothing on the market.

As a result, the Bravo TV star will be taking matters into her own hands and launching her own brand of high end kids clothing with an emphasis on the blue side of things.

Thanks to his mama’s talent and eye for fashion, it’s no doubt sweet Skyler will be the most fashionable baby on the block.

Filed under: Rachel Zoe

Photo credit: GSI Media

7 Comments »»

Post a Comment

  1. Anonymous

    What a waste. I can’t believe how shallow some people are.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous

    She is right about the lack of selection for boys. Especially formal wear.

    Reply
  3. Kristina

    What a vulgar display. I’m so struck by her total lack of class. Given the hard time so many around the world, but even in Rachel’s own state, are having, why not be more circumspect about one’s wealth and privilege? Teach your son discretion; maybe humility will come later.

    Reply
  4. Anon

    Yeah-too much Gucci with make his penis fall off

    Reply
  5. JEE

    Um, boys don’t really wear frocks…you might want to edit that.

    Reply
  6. Anonymous

    Kristina, you’ve made a lot of valid points and I agree that conspicuous consumption like this is pretty crass, especially for babies who will only use things for a brief period.

    In her defence, a lot of the stuff was probably given to her for free (in exchange for the publicity); she’s a self-made millionaire and is entitled to spend her cash how she wants to; she’s getting older — “39″ for the past five years if memory serves and as such, this could be her only child, so it’s understandable that she’d want to indulge the little guy.

    Reply
  7. Kate o

    Most of the items were probably gifts! She is one of the most prominent celebrity stylists, designers go to whatever lengths to ensure she will put one of their dresses on a celebrity.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>