Jennifer Garner & Violet: All American Girls

Jennifer Garner & Violet: All American Girls

Expectant mama Jennifer Garner and her precious 6-year-old daughter Violet were spotted making a fun-filled trip to the American Girl Place at The Grove today (February 24).

A very happy Violet – who was minus her adorable purple frames for today’s mother-daughter outing – proudly carried her new doll as mama Jen carried another one along with her burgeoning baby bump. Violet looked very pretty in her colorful striped dress.

Ben Affleck and his gorgeous group of girls were recently spotted enjoying the attractions at the happiest place on earth – Disneyland! The family-of-four were seen strolling around and later doing a little shopping on their fun field trip.

View Slideshow »»

View All Photos »»

Filed under: Expecting,Jennifer Garner,Violet Affleck

Photo credit: FameFlynet/GSI Media

44 Comments »»

Post a Comment

  1. shey

    violet is tall for her age!

    Reply
  2. Anonymous

    The paps are everywhere in LA, that’s just how it is. Nice spelling…

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      Yet we don’t see even more famous families (Jolie-Pitts, Beckhams etc) half as much as this bunch.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Jolie-Pitts and Beckhams have different lifestyle than the Afflecks, (they also have security detail and don’t venture outside their protective bubble unless they are promoting something, nothing wrong with that) but it is unfair to compare them to this family.

        She is very popular on this site judging by the amout of love (some love her and some love to hate her). Complaining is useless because I don’t think she is going to change her daily routine (she is obviously dedicated to living her life her way regardless as to whether it is in line with your plan or not.

        A wise old owl one said, *you can’t change a person you can only change the way you feel about them*. Btw, no need to call the paps when they are camped outside ones house and follow them wherever they go.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          I highly doubt the paps are camped out front of their house. With celebs who don’t want to be photographed and don’t call the paps, they look annoyed to be photographed. This woman ALWAYS grins into the camera and half the time is even angling her body towards the camera. It’s not about her daily routine or living her life how she wants. It’s about this site choosing to cover her day in and day out doing the same stuff. It’s boring, it’s useless and she has a group of a few crazy obsessive fans on her (like those Kate Gosselin fans) who FREAK OUT every time someone dares to criticize this loser.

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            It’s not the criticism that irks people, it’s the fact that such nonsense is spewed as if it’s **fact**.

            You don’t get to declare categorically that she calls the paps for attention unless you can PROVE this is what happens. You don’t get to post that she’s not a celebrity unless you can PROVE that she’s not. You don’t get to determine that her kids are spoiled rotten unless you can PROVE that they are.

            Nobody can prove any of those things. It’s judgement people have made based on a couple photos they see online. That’s just crazy.

            Mike Tyson is a convicted rapist. <— Fact
            Mike Tyson beats his wife because I saw bruises on her arm. <— Not fact

            See the difference?

          • Grace

            Yes, actually we do get to say those things even if we can’t prove it is true. Just like people get to say “She’s obviously such a great Mom” even when they can’t prove it’s true. Unless you’re going to start lecturing the people who gush about this family about how they can’t prove that JG is a great Mom and therefore shouldn’t state it as fact, then you’re nothing more than a hypocrite.

            This is a comments section, where people get to share their opinions, and that includes the people who don’t agree with you.

  3. Anonymous

    Ok Violet has been photographed with about 10 different American Girl dolls now, I realize they have more money then sense but Violet is 6 years old. Seriously when Jen was on an interview once she talked about how she would not spoil her kids but keep them grounded, for a 6 year old she is obviously very spoiled. How in the world do you keep them grounded and continually buy them toys, dolls, things. I don’t know how you teach your kids to appreciate anything when they have so much, I have personally found that the more I buy the less they appreciate. If this isn’t the case with Violet, I would love to know how she keeps her appreciative of all she has.

    Reply
    • Pie

      Are you serious? As a fan of Affleck family, I admit that Violet has been spotted with different American Girl dolls, but sometimes they were just the same ones with different clothings. Remember they have TWO girls at home. Personally I have always been loving collecting dolls. It makes no sense calling I’m not grounded or something else. Apart from realizing Violet and Seraphina have many dolls and toys, why can’t you recall that they also have many books in sight and have learned how to use public library resources?

      Reply
    • Anonymous to you

      Wow! “She is obviously very spoiled.” Really? Because you’ve seen pictures of a 6 year-old girl with several dolls? The only thing that I think can be assumed, is that Violet like dolls. You have no idea how she attained her collection of dolls. Be it a gift, a reward or reinforcement of good behavior or whether she whines or throws a tantrum to get them. Saying she’s spoiled is presumptuous. Saying she’s “obviously spoiled” is just ignorant.

      Reply
    • Anonymous16

      I don’t she has so many dolls. I’ve only seen her with 2 different American Girl dolls! And Violet doesn’t seem spoiled at all, atleast for me; plus, the Afflecks are obviously very wealthy, but I don’t think they spend the money with no sense – either Jennifer and Ben take the girls to the library instead of buying books, for example.

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      I’ll defend the original person who posted. Is it possible to be rich and famous and raise children who appreciate all that they have? Yes, and maybe Violet and Sera will turn out to be well-rounded, grounded adolescents and adults. But let’s not pretend that Violet and Sera’s upbringing, with the paparazzi following and flashing their every move in public, the private schools (Violet’s school uniform = not a public school), regular trips for manis and pedis, etc. etc. are anything but a privileged upbringing. Violet & Sera are very fortunate, and maybe they will grow up to appreciate having 2 loving and devoted celebrity parents combined with more material goods than any child needs. But don’t blame and shame the original poster for raising an eyebrow about the amount of material goods these 2 girls have. Growing up as the children of Hollywood stars puts you at a DISadvantage in terms of growing up a happy, well adjusted child. Just look at grown children (now adults) who had famous parents. They’ve written memoirs, their stories have been told time and time again.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Who said they didn’t have a priviledged upbringing? Nobody.

        As far as looking at the grown chiclren of famous parents, why don’t you take look around at the grown children of NON-famous parents? They don’t fare any worse statistically. So your “theory” is really nonsense.

        Reply
  4. Anonymous

    Cute

    Reply
  5. Anonymous

    does she have the Paps on speed dial ?
    she is the most over paped celebritiy next to the kardrashions
    jen goes shiopping jen goes for coffee Jen bends over and shows her ripped panties Jen goes to the Park Jen walks down the sidewalk
    you get the idea.. if she is photographed getting a cup of coffee 24 hours after giving birthl then she has a serious paparatizz addiction

    Reply
    • anon.

      So give us this number you are so sure exists.

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      I hope you are not as illiterate as you sound in your post.. By the way, you must love the paparazzi if you come to this site … because it is nothing BUT paparazzi pictures so stop complaining. If you don’t want to see her pictures, stop posting about her pictures. Are you not that smart?

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        The poster isn’t saying they don’t like paparazzi pictures as far as I can see, just that this ‘celeb’ clearly has some sort of deal with them and I presume, they are bored of seeing her on this site. I echo that sentiment and it is impossible *not* to look at them, they are usually top of the page every day, on the side bar, photo of the week etc. etc. on and on and on. It’s about balance, and this site doesn’t have any balance any more.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          Yes you and the poor speller are one and the same, pea brains that complain and post on the picture to add to the number of “hits” on the post which indicate how popular each celeb is….thereby increasing the amount of pictures bought by the site! if you can’t get that through your little head, I can’t help you.

          Reply
    • Anonymous

      AGREED! Seems like she’s got some pretty obsessive and rabid fans who like to jump down people’s throats if some of the other posts are any indication. This woman is a D lister and I’m sick of seeing her EVERY. SINGLE. DAY. Of course she calls the cops. And she always is happy to be photographed. Clear indicator that she sold herself out. AND sold out her children. I would not want my children photographed like that every day.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Christ, you are a moron. None of this has anything to do with being fan. But when you continue to trash a complete stranger with lies, personal attacks, insane conspiracy theories, and completely irrelevant accusations, it’s really annoying.

        1. Just because you don’t like her doesn’t make her a D lister. Do you even know what that term means? She’s a highly successful actress. That is not a matter of opinion. There are lots of successful actors I can’t stand, but I would never call them D listers because it just isn’t true. It doesn’t even make any sense.

        2. Even if she were a D lister, she would still be featured on this site, because they feature everyone, no matter why they’re famous or how famous they are. The feature fringe reality stars and Brits no on has ever even heard of. She is certainly far more famous and successful than most of the people who are featured here.

        3. Even she were not famous at all, she’d still be featured here, because her husband is a famous actor. That means her children are still the children of a celebrity. They only need one famous parent to be featured on this site. These kids have two. This is not a matter of opinion.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          LOVE how you’re so judgmental! Amazing how some of you behave on this site. And even more amazing how you jump like a rabid dog to the defense of a celebrity you don’t even know.

          1. She’s not a D Lister, huh? Ok, well, prove it. Other than Alias and some bad rom-coms from YEARS ago, this woman has barely worked in Hollywood. Her claim to fame is being married to Ben Affleck. And even his career is somewhat stalled. Bit roles don’t count. She has not opened or carried a film in what 6 or 7 years? She’s rarely hired and she’s doing commercials. She was big around the time of her TV show–10 years ago. D LISTER.

          2. Read my post with your wheels turning a bit harder in your head. I never said anything about her being FEATURED. My comment was in regards to being “featured” every single day, sometimes more than once. I would hardly call her more “famous” or “successful” than others on this site.

          3. Love you how used “not a matter of opinion” again as if you’re some cracked out dictator who freaks out when people disagree with YOUR opinion. Again, regardless of whether her husband is famous or not, my point was ENTIRELY about her being featured repeatedly, every day without fail, doing the same things over and over–Starbucks, pedicure, Starbucks, dance class for Violet, Starbucks… etc.

          It is amazing to me to see the vitriol that is spewed out people’s mouths here, like yours. Having NO idea who I am and having almost entirely misread my post, you feel the need to begin your comment with “Christ, you are a moron”. I think you should perhaps look to your own character and figure out what is so wrong with you that you feel the need to call someone a moron. As far as I’m concerned, you are ignorant and rude.

          Reply
        • Anonymous

          You are seriously a PSYCHO STALKER. Get a life of your own. You know nothing more than anyone else on this site. Quit blathering on with your idiocy… you are just coming off as a crazy person. There are medications that people like you can take.

          Reply
  6. Anonymous

    Since she’s due soon, (I think early March) it is possible she’ll have the baby Feb. 29- Leap Day.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      She has said “springtime” over and over again. Why won’t people accept that?

      Reply
      • Grace

        She said in early Novemer that she was due in four months, which would be early March.

        And I’m unclear what your “why won’t people accept that” remark is all about. Why does it matter to you if people accept what she says or not. And FYI, a lot of celebrities have lied about their due dates.

        Reply
  7. Anonymous

    Excuse me …Spelling Police !
    she is way over exposed she is boring and dresses poorly and I would not want my Children to be photographed each and Every single Day of their Life.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      This isn’t about you. No one cares what you would or wouldn’t want for your children. P.S., you might want to take a class on proper capitalization.

      Reply
  8. Anonymous

    She has been photographed with Molly, Julie, Kit, Addy, Kanani, and Rebecca, not to mention a Bitty Baby or two. She is constantly shopping with her, yes she has made some library visits but come on just look at all the shopping trips she has taken her on just in the past month on this site alone. I buy my kids lots too, I am not putting her down, I am just wondering how you keep her appreciative for what she has is all.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      Agreed. Spoiled rotten…. she is not going to be grounded at all. She seems to be obsessed with shopping for toys, dolls, clothes. Sheesh, give it a rest and do something constructive. I was reading they were just at Disney AGAIN? This is not a NORMAL childhood or grounded whatsoever. She is such an overbearing mother. Those kids should be playing all of the time with other kids and not in the malls for heaven’s sake!

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Do something constructive?!?! LOL, like what? Criticize a small child on a celebrity baby blog? Apparently, THAT is constructive, but a small child shopping for dolls is heinous??!!

        You’ve REEEEEEEEALLY got a screwed up perspective, sweetie.

        Reply
  9. Francesca

    Violet is all her mum. She’s a beautiful child!

    Reply
  10. Anonymous

    I know the dolls because my girls collect them.

    Reply
  11. Anonymous

    Jen Garner is much more famous for being a mother than an actress and that is the truth.

    Reply
  12. SMH

    Wow some of ya’ll are really a riot!

    The fact that people pay so close attention to how many dolls she has (and know them by names) shows some of you need to get out more!

    SEcondly, yes she’s due in spring which is mid March. This is her third baby which can come as early as 3 weeks. So to say she can’t have the baby on Feb 29 is stupid she certainly can.

    Thirdly, I remember Jen and Ben had taken issues with the paparazzi so much that they had asked another baby site to NOT post pics of their kids out of respect to their family. This blog obliged and did not. I dont know the back story on it was about a year or so before they were allowed to post pics of the family.
    I do not think they call the paparazzi. I think the paps just find what she does ineresting. Maybe many mom’s like seeing a celeb be normal with her kids. So yes maybe Jen and her kids sell magazines! With that being said someone said she is a D-list celebrity. I beg to differ. She is not an A lister but a D? come on now? If anything she’s an A-list celeb simply bc she’s married to Ben Affleck but she has enough film credits to her name to atleast be a B-list celeb imo.

    Reply
  13. Grace

    Wow, it’s hilarious to see the people who are frothing at the mouth in defense of a celebrity they have never met. Why does it matter if some people don’t like JG? It makes you look like a bunch of obsessed, starry-eyed teenagers to be vehemently defending JG like this. Grow up and get a life. Not everyone is going to agree with you and gush over this woman.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      Whatever you say, Janna.

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      I can’t speak for anyone else here, but I have never “gushed” over Jennifer Garner or any other celeb. I just have no patience for idiots who think they can make up ridiculous, plainly false things and present them as fact. If you claim the sky is green and the ocean is purple and insist that you it’s true, I’m going to call you an idiot and point out that you’re wrong no matter what the context is.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Um, in this country we have freedom of speech, which includes statements that may or may not be true. It is their opinion and you have the right to state yours. You foam at the mouth if anyone says anything negative about JG. Face it… some people just can’t stand her. That is just the way it is.. Screaming with your keyboard is not going to change anything so give it a rest and go get yourself a life and a good doctor.

        Reply
  14. Maya

    Bhatnagar provides the fionowllg quote from the Ramayana: “Rama was born on the Navami tithi of Shukla Paksha of Chaitra masa (9th day of the increasing phase of the moon in the lunar month of Chaitra). At that time, the nakshatra was Punarvasu, and Sun, Mars, Saturn, Jupiter and Venus were in Aries, Capricorn, Libra, Cancer and Pisces respectively. Lagna was Cancer and Jupiter & Moon were shining together. — Ramayana 1.18.8,9The conditions can be summarized as follows, according to Bhatnagar:1. Sun in Aries2. Saturn in Libra3. Jupiter in Cancer4. Venus in Pisces5. Mars in Capricorn6. Lunar month of Chaitra7. 9th day after New Moon (Navami Tithi, Shukla Paksh)8. Moon near Punarvasu Nakshatra (Pollux star in Gemini constellation)9. Cancer as Lagna (Cancer constellation rising in the east)10. Jupiter above the horizonAccording to the Planetarium software, it provides the fionowllg date: Sri Rama Navami 10th January 5114 BCE Birth Day of Rama, Observation at 12.30 p.m.Bhatnagar continues: “By using a powerful planetarium software, I found that the planetary positions mentioned in Ramayana for the date of birth of Lord Ram had occurred in the sky at around 12.30 p.m. of 10th January 5114 BC. It was the ninth day of the Shukla Paksh of Chaitra month too. Moving forward, after 25 years of the birth of Lord Ram, the position of planets in the sky tallies with their description in Ramayana. Again, on the amavasya (new moon) of the 10th month of the 13th year of exile the solar eclipse had indeed occurred and the particular arrangement of planets in the sky was visible. ( Date comes to 7th October, 5077 BC). Even the occurrence of subsequent two eclipses also tally with the respective description in Valmiki Ramayana. (Date of Hanuman’s meeting Sita at Lanka was 12th September, 5076 BC). In this manner the entire sequence of the planetary positions gets verified and all the dates can be precisely determined.”

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>