Jennifer Garner & Her Girls: Bouncing From Ballet

Jennifer Garner & Her Girls: Bouncing From Ballet

Jennifer Garner and Seraphina, 3, went to pick up Violet, 6, at her ballet class on Saturday (April 28). The girls held hands for awhile but then Seraphina decided to scoot off ahead. The actress did catch up to her and had her stay with the group. Samuel, 2 months, wasn’t with them.

Garner, 40, recently joked that she wasn’t sure if she deserved getting The Female Star Of The Year Award at CinemaCon in Las Vegas.

USA Today reports during her acceptance speech she joked, “I told my mom the other day I was getting this award . . . and I was excited and feeling proud and thought she was going to be proud, and then there was this pause on the other end of the line. “She said, ‘Jennifer, do these people know you haven’t worked in the last year?’ I said, ‘Yeah, I feel they probably know what I’ve been up to. I haven’t stepped foot on a set. You are correct, mom.’ ”

She added, “She said, ‘Can they take this back? Because every time I talk to you, you are breastfeeding, you are running car pool, you are on the library committee — you are not acting!’ “

View Slideshow »»

View All Photos »»

Filed under: Jennifer Garner,Seraphina Affleck,Violet Affleck

Photo credit: Pacific Coast News/Bauer Griffin/FameFlynet

33 Comments »»

Post a Comment

  1. Nina D.

    She’s such a wonderful Mom.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      Who lives for the paparizze.lol

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Her kids are some of the happiest I’ve ever seen so it appears she’s doing something right.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          O yes smile for the cameras …

          I guess because Sandra Bullock son dosen’t smile that much she must be a bad mother or is not doing somtheing right. Not many kids will smile with strange people yelling thier names and pushing and shoving flashing cameras in their faces. But I guess when your mother is like jennifer garner parading you in front of the paparizze on the daily those crazy man become your friends because the woman and her kids can go unseen or seen very little when she wants to.

          Reply
      • I Me Mine

        Are they supposed to stop living their lives because the paparazzi stakes out kid friendly areas to supply the need of the people like you who visit sites like the one we are on right now?

        Reply
        • Anna Ray

          Who said she should stop living her life when Jen wants to not be seen she not like last week she and her kids were were M.I.A all last week. Do you think the kids just stayed home and never went to school or left the house, no most likely Jen decided to keep a low profile which she has done so in the past going a week or two with no photo of her or the kids. 

          She keep her son from being photograph for two months going to the doctors office,  she had the nanny bring the baby around the back so thier wouldnt be photo of him, why  didn’t she do the  samething it would have kept her and her older kids from being phonograph as well?

          When Jen wants to be seen which is more likely then not she can be seen ever single day for months. I know that being photograph by the paparizze is going to happen it comes with being a celebrity but when it on happens almost daily, monthly basis thats a celebrity that wants attention. She is known now more for her dimple paraded than her acting it’s great PR for her keep her name out their.

          Reply
        • Anna Ray

          Who said she should stop living her life when Jen wants to not be seen she not like last week she and her kids were were M.I.A all last week. Do you think the kids just stayed home and never went to school or left the house, no most likely Jen decided to keep a low profile which she has done so in the past going a week or two with no photo of her or the kids. 

          She keep her son from being photograph for two months going to the doctors office,  she had the nanny bring the baby around the back so thier wouldnt be photo of him, why  didn’t she do the  samething it would have kept her and her older kids from being phonograph as well?

          When Jen wants to be seen which is more likely then not she can be seen ever single day for months. I know that being photograph by the paparizze is going to happen it comes with being a celebrity but when it on happens almost daily, monthly basis thats a celebrity that wants attention. She is known now more for her dimple paraded than her acting it’s great PR.

          Reply
  2. Anonymous

    There are some pictures of baby Samuel ! He’s definitely beautiful.

    Reply
  3. Anonymous

    Now THAT is an appropriate outdoor ballet outfit.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      The last one she had on was appropriate, too. Do you cover your kids from head to toe in a burka in case there is a random pedophile roaming the area? Stupid, just stupid.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Paparazzi do not photograph me or my kids and their photos therfore do not end up all over the internet.

        Reply
        • anonymous

          By your logic, then EVERY single photo of her girls is at risk for pedophile activity. A pedophile doesn’t need a naked photo, they can doctor any photo, whether or not the girl has tights on or not.

          And remember, your kids have a 90% higher chance of being molested by someone you know, not some random stranger photoshopping photos of children.

          Reply
          • Anna Ray

            actually most paparizze are known for having a criminal record and background, so ya it it’s likely they could be pedophile.

          • Anonymous

            Right on, Anna Ray. I’ve also heard that more specifically, many are registered s*x offenders.

          • Anonymous

            Valid point – I’ve seen these guys up close and they are rabid grease monkeys. Wouldn’t let them anywhere near my children — feel very sorry for celebs like Garner who are mobbed on a regular basis.

          • Anonymous

            No, by my logic, the photos of her girls not wearing any form of pants are at risk for pedophile activity.

            I never said I was worried about her daughters being molested, the point is I wouldn’t want pedophiles looking (and probably masturbating) at pictures of my daughter with no pants on.

          • Anonymous

            You (and most other like you) clearly have NO idea how pedophiles operate, think and behave. They don’t need photos of a little girl without pants on. They’ll use any photo of any child anywhere, dressed in a parka or in a bikini. Doesn’t matter.

            That was my point: Whether or not this child has pants on is no different from all the beach photos posted here of celebrity kids. I really don’t see you all up in arms about them, when the kids are usually LESS dressed than Violet was in the other photos.

  4. Anonymous

    Samuel, was with the nanny. Looks like super mom can’t handle all of her three kids all on her own!

    Reply
  5. Anonymous

    I’m going to get a load of criticism for this, but I don’t like how she dresses the girls. Makes them look homely. I’m not saying they should be dressed like mini adults or anything, but sandals and socks? Yikes. Lol.

    Reply
  6. Anonymous

    I love her and greatly admire the way she handles the paparazzi situation. She set about her duties as a *famous* mom in a very professional way while making her children feel so un-inhibitied (not unduly affected by their presence, because let’s face it the days of the paparazzi are here to stay for celebs) safe and carefree.

    She is amazing and her children are definitely benefitting because there is photographic proof that they are very well adjusted and happy kids. She get my vote for BEST CELEBRITY MOM EVER!

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>