It’s Samuel Garner Affleck!
In the first glimpse of Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner‘s 2-month-old son Samuel, the angelic baby was spotted out for a stroll with the nanny in Santa Monica, Calif. on Saturday (April 28).
After having two daughters – Violet, 6, and Seraphina, 3 – the high-profile couple finally welcomed a boy! Their third child was born on February 27.
“We are happy to announce on February 27, Jennifer gave birth to a healthy baby boy, Samuel Garner Affleck,” Ben wrote on his Facebook timeline.
View Slideshow »»
I don’t like pics of celeb kids out with nannies, but I’ll make an exception for this one. Samuel is so adorable!
If that is in fact their child, I don’t think that’s the nanny – there are pictures of the whole family at the beach in Santa Barbara and the baby is with a much younger woman who is definitely the nanny.
Maybe they have more than one nanny? I just found those pictures you’re talking about, and there’s a possibility there’s multiple nannies.
Plus, they probably saw them coming out of the house or something (creepy), which is how they know this Samuel.
Most celebrities have more than one nanny.
You act like they can’t have more them one nanny or were you hopping they didn’t.
Celebrities have more then one nanny on staff so they can rotate them give one nanny time off to have a life of their own and having the other nanny on hand to help out with the kids.
This site always calls people they don’t recognize or can’t identify “nannies”. Doesn’t mean they actually are. It could very well be a friend or relative. Regardless, why do people care so much about nannies? I just don’t get it.
You say why do people care so much about nannies and yet your here try to come up with every reason why the lady in the pictuer is not a nanny. Really JG has been using nannies for years why is it so hard for you to believe that the lady is one.
Really, wow, thanks, I had no idea. The point is when this site calls someone a “nanny” it isn’t reliable because they have no idea who she is. What I care about factual accuracy.
The point is further that it’s irrelevant whether she’s a nanny or not, because whether celebs use nannies is no one else’s business, and that there’s nothing wrong with it if they do.
Finally, you might want to take some English lessons. Your comment is barely comprehensible. Perhaps start with learning how to use punctuation properly.
Both of you should care about punctuation, grammar and typos!
If its not a big deal why are you making it one?
Really who cares if CBS called the lady a nanny, and if your so bothered by it why do you not comment on every post that unknown person is called a nanny, why are you only commenting this post.
Oh for god’s sake. Are you really this stupid? I was responding to a ongoing debate about whether the person in the photos was a nanny. I don’t comment on every other post because I don’t read every other post. And because I actually don’t care whether celebs use nannies or not. Meaning, I don’t judge them if the do and I don’t glorify them if they don’t. It’s not my business. And I don’t understand why people think it’s theirs – which is why I asked why people care so much. It’s a sincere question and no one should have trouble answering it. If you have an opinion you should be able to stand up for and explain it if challenged or questioned. Otherwise your opinion is worthless.
It’s not hard. You’re just stupid.
Whoever it is I’m sure the Afflecks are like, “really you can’t even take our son out for a stroll and keep him fully covered?!” lol
I know right I can see Jennifer Garner going to have a BF when she finds out.
Because you know Jennifer Garner so well??
What’s a BF?
A B*tch fit.
I don’t think Jennifer will be pissed, because she exposes her kids a lot. It’s probably her decision to show off her son now that he is two months old (same age as seraphina when we had her first glimpse)
PERFECT! AWN
he’s so cut!
I really don’t think that’s a nanny. She’s probably one of the grandmas.
CBS has picture of both Ben and Jen mothers and pointed them out in photos, so why would they not do it here and Why is it so hard for you to believe its a nanny. Because she old or becasue you had this version that Jeniffer Garner dose’t us nannies.
These pics seem really creepy to me. He’s only 2 months old and already being photographed without his mum or dad.
creepy is how Over photogrpahed Jennifer Garner and her family is
Creepy is how Sam’s parents don’t want to be seen with their son beach with the girls smi,e on Bens face shows it all. The nanny is a brunette that Jen has had since Vi was a baby !
So they have more then one nanny not a big deal.
Gwen Stefani for example has more then one nanny but most of the time we see the same girl but every once in a while we will see the other nannies.
Gwen Stefani for example has more then one nanny
—————————————————————
LOL Anna Ray — we’re not going to go “there”, okay?
Jen has multiple nannies and this one above is one of them. It’s not rocket science folks or a big deal.
Everyone commenting on this site is illiterate. Sometimes I wish the ‘math question’ was more advanced to weed out the dummies.
So that whould include you becasue your commenting on this site.lol
Ya I agree they should weed out the dummies and let’s start with you.
Your response proves that you are in fact the dummy.
whould = would
becasue = because
your = you’re
did you ever thought about the fact that not everyone commenting here is a native english speaker?!
“becasue” could also be a typing mistake…
just saying (or in this case: writing)….
She probably thinked about that but was making a point that you shoodn’t call someone else an idiot when your being an idiot to.
ok, you have a point. i agree in this case
Yes, me too.
1 + 0 = 2, right?
btw, “because” is spelled “B-E-C-A-U-S-E”. And “your” should be spelled “YOU’RE” in this case. Idiot.
There should be a grammar question
Ha! I totally agree on the math question. I also find it creepy that websites would purchase photos of babies without their celebrity parents. Gross.
What does websites purchasing photos of babies without their parents have to do with her comment? Oh right, nothing.
Second part of my answer has to do with the very first comment about babies being photographed without their celebrity parents. I didn’t realize you were the message board moderator. Hahahaha.
You probably should have replied to the first comment then.
You probably should have read only the first part of my answer then.
Jen has 1 nanny! Not several… She is shown on the beach with a covered Sam!
In a carrier ! Same beach that they are on!
Jen has 1 nanny! Not several… She is shown on the beach with a covered Sam!
In a carrier ! Same beach that they are on!
Jen has 1 nanny! Not several… She is shown on the beach with a covered Sam!
In a carrier ! Same beach that they are on!
Jen has 1 nanny! Not several… She is shown on the beach with a covered Sam!
In a carrier ! Same beach that they are on!
Jen has 1 nanny! Not several… She is shown on the beach with a covered Sam!
In a carrier ! Same beach that they are on!
And you know this how? Are you her friends with her that you know she only has 1 nanny.
So she has more then one nanny it’s not the end of the world she could have add the new nanny when she got pregnant with her third child or the other nanny can just be one that she has for at home because the lady is uncomfortable around paparizze taking her picture.
They have more than one nanny…. Are people really bickering about this?!
Um. How do we know if this is actually Jennifer and Ben’s baby? I mean, isn’t it possible that this is just some random lady out with her random child?
Wow! Angry much.
If this is Samuel I think it is creepy that photographers would be stalking him at 2 months old without his parents.
We all comment on how crazy it is when celebs keep their kids under wraps but this would be why.
I believe the line between public and private has been blurred by the media as much as his parents are famous we are not entitled to be shown pictures or let into his life.
I hope this is not Samuel and that Jen and Ben are able to introdue him to us when they are good and ready.
Who are you directing your comment at?
Although I don’t get your first sentence (who is angry?), ITA with the rest of your points. These paparazzi guys can be very aggressive sometimes and celebs are justifiably afraid for their children’s safety and well being.
Jennifer Garner has been photographed with this particular woman many, many times. Now if she is a nanny or relative or friend I have no clue because unlike most people on this post I do not know her personally.
Jen was quoted the other day talking about how she hasn’t set foot in studio in over a year…if she hasn’t worked, what is the reason for a nanny?
What is the reason for the nanny?
Because she wants one and like most celebrities can obviously afford one (or 2 or 3). Unlike certain other celebs though, Garner seems to be a real hands on mom and spends a lot of time with her kids one-on-one WITHOUT a nanny by her side 24/7. Most of us would probably jump at the chance for an extra set of hands even if like her we genuinely like to be with our kids.
what stroller is that?