LeAnn Rimes & Jake Cibrian: Malibu Shoppers

LeAnn Rimes & Jake Cibrian: Malibu Shoppers

Singer LeAnn Rimes and her step-son Jake Cibrian, 5, were seen shopping together in Malibu, Calif. on Friday (May 4). Big brother Mason, 8, was not with the pair on their Friday outing.

According to Fox News, it seems there has been some speculation that LeAnn is in cahoots with the paparazzi, given all the swimsuit shots that have been circulating throughout the media the past few months or so. She has recently been photographed in teeny bikinis frolicking on the beaches in Mexico, Maui and Malibu. As a result, certain industry insiders are speculating that these pics aren’t paparazzi shots at all but that LeAnn is actually tipping off the photographers to stage the shots.

Making reference to a recent batch of photos of Leann and her husband Eddie Cibrian on a beach in Cabo San Lucas, one photo editor comments that “those photographs came into all the magazines and websites fully captioned and saying, ‘LeeAnn Rimes on a trip to renew her vows.’ There is no vow renewing in those pictures. There is no way the paps would have known she was doing that unless she specifically told them.”

“Plus the paps just don’t get access like that in Cabo,” the editor adds. “They can’t get close enough to the celebrities without permission to get the quality of those photos. They were right next to her. There was no long lens. This was not intrusive in any way. This was a photo shoot.”

View Slideshow »»

View All Photos »»

Filed under: Jake Cibrian 2,LeAnn Rimes 2

Photo credit: AKM-GSI

205 Comments »»

Post a Comment

  1. Anonymous

    Yea i agree brandi isnt perfect but leann lets the paps know where she will be they even went to her honeymoon and got close up completely posed shots of her. she also calls them to go to soccer games and document her being a good step mom. There are articles out there from credible sources saying so and LeAnn even has said herself she tips the paps off sometimes. i know shes a “Celebrity” but give me a freakin break she is not up there with the big guns and you dont see them being papped all over the place. LeAnn is scum. Brandi might not be innocent but my god LeAnn is the scum of the earth.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous

    Why is she grabbing her vagina??? It makes me wonder if Eddie’s cheating ways caused an STD which he then gave to Leann! Wouldn’t that be funny!

    Reply
  3. Anonymous

    Both kids are named Jake?

    Reply
  4. Anonymous

    Tips off the Paps to be photographed for these ~ staged outings
    you think?

    Reply
  5. Anonymous

    Shopping? Nope, it’s a STAGED photo-op. check out the name of the pap agency. GSI. The same pap agency that took all those photos of them while they were in Cabo last week. Thanks for acknowleding that Leann sets up staged photo-ops and posting the article from Fox News.

    Leann is such a low life. So after she and Eddie make a big fuss over how they don’t want the boys to make appearances on Brandi’s show, Leann then turns around and sets up a staged photo-op with the youngest with GSI? For what? To taunt Brandi?

    Of course the oldest boy is rarely seen with Leann and Eddie lately, I guess even he isn’t as cooperative as his younger brother.

    Now if the media would call Leann and Eddie out on their double standards.

    Reply
  6. Anonymous

    So all this staged photo-op proves is that Eddie and Leann are hypocrites. So he refuses to allow his kids to film for RHOBH, and yet each and every week he allows Leann to exploit his sons via twitter and her staged photo-ops. How come when Leann and Eddie exploit the boys, they are not concerned about the teasing and bullying he will face from his peers? So let’s see how many times this little boys face will be plastered over some blog or tabloid as a result of this staged photo-op because his father is “protecting” him.

    “Brandi Glanville’s Ex Eddie Cibrian Won’t Let Their Kids Film RHOBH Because They Were ‘Teased’ (EXCLUSIVE)”

    “Eddie Cibrian refused to allow his two children with ex-wife Brandi Glanville be filmed on the Real Housewives of Beverly Hills — a move that could end the brash model’s hopes of becoming a fulltime cast member.”

    “Bravo wanted to feature Mason, 8, and 5-year old Jake as part of a key storyline detailing their mother’s long-time feud with her ex-husband, 38, who left her for country superstar LeAnn Rimes, who he has been married to for the past year. The couple renewed their vows, last week.”

    “A source close to the production told Celebuzz that Cibrian, 38, intervened on Glanville’s plans to feature their children. He had a lawyer advise her that she needed him to agree, given the pair share joint legal custody of the children.”

    “Eddie had to protect the kids,” a source said. “Filming in the home is not healthy, especially at Mason and Jake’s ages.”

    “Indeed, as the insider pointed out, Jake was “teased and bullied” at school after he was featured during an episode last season, peeing on the lawn at co-star Adrienne Maloof’s Beverly Hills mansion.”

    -From Celebuzz(a site that Leann also feeds information to via one of her fans)

    Reply
  7. Anonymous

    She isn’t wearing a bra and why is she touching her private parts? What a great stepmother!!

    Reply
  8. Anonymous

    Why did Leann set up this staged photo-op with the child?

    From RumorFix:

    “EXCLUSIVE: Brandi Glanville Losing Housewife Status Over Kids?”

    Is Brandi Glanville getting kicked off the Real Housewives of Beverly Hills before the season has even begun?

    According to some gossip sites, Brandi’s ex-husband Eddie Cibrian and his wife LeAnn Rimes are refusing to let the children (Mason and Jake) appear on Real Housewives, and as a result Bravo no longer wants Brandi to be a full-time cast member.

    But it turns out this is not the case. A Bravo insider assures RumorFix that not only is Brandi back for season 3, she is CONFIRMED as a full-time cast member – with or without her children.

    RumorFix also reached out to a source close to Brandi, who told us the model is going to fight to keep the boys with her on the show.

    “Eddie is going to fight Brandi about having them in the background on the show,” says our source. “They [Eddie and LeAnn] are constantly doing photo ops and interviews that include the kids and Brandi does nothing. She is going to fight back but Bravo isn’t involved, it’s all good with them. Eddie and LeAnn are always doing staged photo ops and interviews – Brandi just wants to see the kids when she has them.”

    Reply
  9. Anonymous

    “Eddie is going to fight Brandi about having them in the background on the show,” says our source. “They [Eddie and LeAnn] are constantly doing photo ops and interviews that include the kids and Brandi does nothing. She is going to fight back but Bravo isn’t involved, it’s all good with them. Eddie and LeAnn are always doing staged photo ops and interviews – Brandi just wants to see the kids when she has them.”

    -RumorFix

    Reply
  10. Anonymous

    “Eddie is going to fight Brandi about having them in the background on the show,” says our source. “They [Eddie and LeAnn] are constantly doing photo ops and interviews that include the kids and Brandi does nothing. She is going to fight back but Bravo isn’t involved, it’s all good with them. Eddie and LeAnn are always doing staged photo ops and interviews – Brandi just wants to see the kids when she has them.”

    -RumorFix

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      Oh great. So now their mom can whore them out too.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Not according to Leann and Eddie, ONLY Leann and Eddie are allowed to whore the boys out.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          It’s disgusting that she WANTS to whore them out.

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            @7:55

            And yet where is your disgust for how Leann whored the boys out on Friday and Sunday?

          • Anonymous

            Leann is >>ALWAYS<< disgusting, but she is not those children’s mother.

            Brandi is their mother, and as their mother, she should WANT them to have their privacy and not be part of that trashy show.

          • Anonymous

            @2:26

            As those kids father shouldn’t Eddie WANT his kids to have their privacy and not be part of the trashy reality show known as LEANN RIMES? Seriously everyone knows who those kids because LEANN and EDDIE are constantly parading them before the cameras. Eddie has no room to argue about how trashy RHOBH is, when he and Leann had a druken orgy with Liz on a balcony while his kids were just a few feet away; Leann attended his son’s birthday party wearing a see through dress with no bra; Leann exposes the boys to people who stalk and harass Brandi on twitter; or when Leann humps on Eddie in a skimpy bikini while the boys are sitting right next them.

            Since Leann is always tweeting constantly about how she will do anything for the boys and puts them first, why are we still seeing these staged photo-ops of her with the boys? Where is her respect for their privacy?

            Since Eddie told a judge that he didn’t want his kids to experience ANY TYPE of public exposure why then did Leann invite GSI, the same pap agency that Leann uses to take the photos of her and Eddie in Cabo, to the soccer game on Sunday and shopping on Fridya?

          • Anonymous

            Yes, he SHOULD want his kids to want privacy, but he’s a famewhore, too. What a damned shame that this kids don’t have a single immediate relative that simply cares about what’s best for him.

            I think we can all conclude now that Leann, Eddie AND Brandi are all selfish famewhores that are NOT interested in the best interests of those boys. Eddie and Brandi most especially should be ashamed of themselves as those boys’ parents. Shame on them both!

          • Anonymous

            Well Leann and Eddie won, so despite the fact that Brandi won’t be allowed to show the boys on her show, Eddie and Leann will continue to exploit the boys via these staged photo-ops and twitter.Brandi has nothing to be ashamed about, no one knew who these kids were until LEANN and EDDIE paraded them in front of the cameras and EDDIE allowed Leann to tweet and blog about the kids.

          • KTGrace

            She WANTS them on that trashy show. Yes, she SHOULD be ASHAMED of that. She’d be whoring them out too if she could. Disgraceful, the whole lot of them.

          • Anonymous

            Brandi has nothing to be ashamed for, especially when her ex-hubby who doesn’t have a job is out partying in Cabo, househunting, and “buying” rings when he told a judge that he can’t pay his child support because he doesn’t have a job.

            If you watch those shows the children are hardly ever involved in much. You will see them feeding the kids or attending birthday parties with the kids. Besides, everyone only knows these boys because of LEANN and EDDIE. Perhaps if Leann and Eddie had practiced what that preached, then you would have a point.

            Seriously those shows are not trashy. BTW, Leann is friends with Kim K, do you also consider Kim K show trashy?

            What happened to your name? Now it’s KTGrace? And your handwriting has changed, just like what happened in the thread about Brandi writing a book.
            It’s disgraceful that you came back pretending to be a different poster.

          • Anonymous

            Well Leann and Eddie won, so despite the fact that Brandi won’t be allowed to show the boys on her show, Eddie and Leann will continue to exploit the boys via these staged photo-ops and twitter.Brandi has nothing to be ashamed about, no one knew who these kids were until LEANN and EDDIE paraded them in front of the cameras and EDDIE allowed Leann to tweet and blog about the kids.

  11. Anonymous

    This site must be paying attention to what we are posting because they didn’t even bother to talk about Leann’s dress or how “cute” Leann looks in her dress or the fact that she is wearing the anniversary ring that she bought herself like they usually do. That’s an improvement. In fact it’s a HUGE improvement. And did you see their title? No mention of “Leann and her family” or “Leann and her boy”. Just plain Leann and Jake. Seriously, they only dedicated 3 lines to Leann’s staged photo-op and the rest of the article is about how she sets up staged photo-ops, when normally they would be gushing over what a great stepmother she is. This happened on Friday, so why is it being posted now? Does that mean that there are more staged photo-ops of her with the boys to come?

    I must say, this site did much, much, much better. This wasn’t their usual butt kissing article!Great Job. I didn’t even think it was possible for this site to write anything but their usual glowing articles about Leann. Now if they would call Leann and Eddie out on her double standards.

    Reply
  12. Anonymous

    So on Friday, Leeanne pays Radaronline to write a negative story about Brandi, sets up a staged photo-op with Brandi’s kids, pays Celebuzz to write another fluffpiece, and then pays Guilana Rancic to use The Fashion Police as a platform to promote Leanne’s marriage to Eddie, justify her affair with Eddie, and trash Brandi. Good job Leeanne, the world dislikes you even more than did!

    Reply
  13. Anonymous

    Leann is hillbilly white trash. You can put a dress on a pig but its still Piggy Leann!

    Reply
  14. Kty

    this whole thing is ridiculous on so many level…all parents involved are famewhores,all of them including Brandi who no one knew existed until this whole Eddie/LeAnn affair.Why can’t they think about the kids?LeAnn with all the photo-ops,Brandi who thinks that we all want to hear about their drama via her twitter….why can’t they just get along for the sake of those kids?people say that Brandi is doing it the right way,how?by bashing her kids dad and stepmom?the thing is those kids probably love LeAnn too because she seems to really care for them,will they be happy knowing that their mom were ok with people bashing a woman who also has a part in their lives?Brandi could have stopped the madness a while ago but she loves it,she now has fans…they are all ridiculous.And for people being upset that LeAnn is more photographed with the boys than Brandi…ummmmm LeAnn is the celebrity here,we all use to know her for her accomplishments so if she is a z-lister than Brandi isn’t even on the list.They should just stop bashing each other or try to convince us that they are better than the other and focused on raising those kids in a sane environment..tired of all of them especially Brandi who as a mom should know better…

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      Wow another bait and switch, where you start off saying that both Brandi and Leann are wrong and then go on to make your post into a trash Brandi fest. Leann is not the victim. Didn’t you pull the same thing in another thread and then threw a tantrum when people didn’t fall for your stunt?

      When did Brandi bash Leann and Eddie? Because she called Leann and Eddie out for feeding false information to ROL about her? Brandi has been being nice to Leann and Eddie, but how much is she supposed to take, especially when Leann is going behind her back and having her fans leak nasty things about Brandi to ROL? Especially when Leann is setting up these staged photo-ops just to taunt Brandi.

      Leann bribes the boys to make them like her. DB even said that he has talks with the boys. So the “love” that these boys have for Leann is based solely on brainwashing and bribery.

      Seriously. And yet, Leann has no problem allowing her fans and friends and staffmemers bash Brandi. How do you think the boys will feel when they all the mean and nasty things Leann allowed her fans, staffmembers, and friends to say about Brandi?

      Brandi has stopped the madness, if you remember all of this started when LEANN RIMES had one of her fans feed false information about Brandi to ROL. And now Leann is upset because it all has backfired? Brandi doesn’t owe Leann a thing, if Leann is going to keep publicly attacking her, Brandi has every right to defend herself.

      Brandi isn’t on the list? Seriously one media outlet put it this way, Leann and Eddie are only causing problems for Brandi because they are upset over how much attention she is getting because both of their careers are in the toilet.

      Like we told you in the other thread, Leann is photographed with the boys more for one reason and one reason only, because Leann calls the paps. It’s funny that you would even use the celebrity excuse when this site posted the article from Fox News stating that Leann sets up deals with the paps. If Leann REALLY cared about those kids, then she wouldn’t keep setting up these staged photo-ops with them and she wouldn’t have sent you here to pose as a “neutral” poster and slam Brandi on her behalf.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        That is not what “bait and switch” means.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          Here is the definition, now try to understand why this term can be used to describe your orginal post.

          Bait and Switch: “Bait-and-switch is a form of fraud, most commonly used in retail sales but also applicable to other contexts. First, customers are “baited” by advertising for a product or service at a low price; second, the customers discover that the advertised good is not available and are “switched” to a costlier product.”

          Just in case you are still having trouble, this is how it can be broken down in terms that you understand.

          1) Bait: You pretend to be neutral, disliking both Brandi and Leann. Because if you start off bashing Brandi from the start, then it won’t get people to support you.

          2) Switch: Once people get past the first three sentences of your post, it becomes clear that you are not neutral and that the whole intent of your post was to sell a different “product “(aka why people should support Leann instead of Brandi), and not the neutrality position you started off with in the first place.

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            I didn’t post the original comment you responded to. However, congratulations on being able to copy and paste a dictionary entry. But just because you can do that doesn’t mean you actually understand the definition, because you are not still not using it correctly. The person you responded to was not trying to sell you something (like, actual goods or services, in exchange for actual money) and then changing the terms afterward (and no, the “other contexts” in the definition does not apply here). You can’t just define words the way you want because you think that’s what they mean. What you are actually doing is accusing the person of being inherently contradictory. That is not the same as bait and switch.

          • Anonymous

            @11:48

            So basically what you are saying is that you are upset because someone dared to copy and paste the definition of “bait and switch” in response to the post that you made earlier? Seriously, how many times have we had to explain your own posts to you? And you want to insist that it’s everyone else who doesn’t understand? No matter how you spin it, it’s BAIT and SWITCH.

            Let’s begin with the obvious. As the definition states, bait and switch is used in RETAIL sales, but it can be what…applied to other CONTEXTS. What do you think that means? You do understand what other contexts means, right? Of course you do, right? The person, YOU, weren’t being inherently contradictory because your intention was to trick people into supporting Leann by pretending to be neutral.

            Now if we use your RETAIL theory, then “bait and switch” still applies.

            1) PRODUCT being sold: Leann Rimes, but under the pretense of neutrality

            You do understand why Leann Rimes is considered a product, right? She markets her voice, body, personal life, face, etc…so that it makes money or a profit for her.

            2)CHANGING TERMS: You started off neutral. And then you change your position by attempting to make Leann look good by depicting Brandi as the villian.

            3) Actual money is exchanged because Leann fans have bragged about how Leann rewards them when they trash Brandi.

            There seems to be something wrong with your logic because here are more examples to contradict what you are saying.

            a) Definition of BAIT AND SWITCH

            1: a sales tactic in which a customer is attracted by the advertisement of a low-priced item but is then encouraged to buy a higher-priced one

            2: the ploy of offering a person something desirable to gain favor (as political support) then thwarting expectations with something less desirable

            From Merriam Webstar

          • Anonymous

            I’m not upset about anything, but it certainly seems like you are. I’m just pointing out that you don’t know what you’re talking about. You can copy all the dictionary definitions you want, it doesn’t mean you actually understand them.

          • Anonymous

            Obviously I do know what I am talking about because TWO different sources contradicted you. That’s TWO sources that flat out mentioned that “bait and switch” can be applied to things other than RETAIL. That’s TWO different sources that demonstrates that “bait and switch” can be applied to Leann seeing as how her voice, body, face, personal life, and etc are PRODUCTS that she markets with these staged photo-ops and twipics, you attempted to sell the product to use by pretending to neutral and then depicting Brandi as the villian. Since you are the one who is arguing that “bait and switch” doesn’t mean what it says, despite the fact that I posted TWO sources that contradict you, it’s clear to everyone that it’s YOU who doesn’t actually understand. I’m not at all surprised that once again here is another simple concept that you struggle with, you can’t even understand your own posts and we have to constantly break your posts down for you. You did the same thing with CREED vs SCREEDS and with “housewife” vs RHOBH. So this is just another attempt for you to save face, but as we can see it’s not working in your favor.

            The other thing that makes it obvious that I am right is the fact that you are rewriting history and whining because someone dared to challenge you with physical proof.

            So basically all post 6:19 proves is that you either have a severe reading comprehension problem or you only see what you want to see. Keep up the posts, it’s your crediblity that is suffering! Just like it did with the CREEDS vs SCREEDS post and the “housewife” vs RHOBH posts.

            I love when Leann “fans” think that they are being smart, when in reality they are only showing that they don’t know much. Even with the evidence in front of them, they will argue that it doesn’t say what it says.

          • Anonymous

            @6:19

            So you still want to insist that “bait and switch” only applies to RETAIL because here are even more definitions of “bait and switch” that contradict you:

            “bait and switch” being applied in the context of technology:

            •The provision of one page for a search engine or directory and a different page for other user agents at the same URL. Various methods can be used, e.g. Agent Name Delivery or IP Delivery.

            •Marketing technique where you make something look overtly pure or as though it has another purpose to get people to believe in it or vote for it (by linking at it or sharing it with friends), then switch the intent or purpose of the website after you gain authority. It is generally easier to get links to informational websites than commercial sites. Some new sites might gain authority much quicker if they tried looking noncommercial and gaining influence before trying to monetize their market position.

            •Bait and switch is considered as a spam technique when used in SEO. It provides one page for a search engine or directory and a different page for other user agents at the same URL. Sometimes it creates an optimized page and submits to search engines or directory, but replaces with the regular page as soon as the optimized page has been indexed.

      • Kty

        you are obviously sick if you think that…this is my second time posting about this crazies,i’m no one mouthpiece so i don’t why you think i get in those crazy rounds with you….i don’t care if she tips the paps,my point is that i’m tired of hearing about them and their craziness and yes Brandi goes on twitter to bash them and like i said i expect better from her being a mom.If you don’t like what i said about your ‘Star’ sorry.They are all wrong and should think about the kids.that’s all.Everything i said about LeAnn success is true,those are all facts that can be checked,that does not make me one of her supporters…ridiculous,the only time i comment on this site is when grown adults are bashing Suri and when i dare to comment about how crazy some adults act,i get bashed for including Brandi…some of you need to get a life fast.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          @7:36

          Let me guess, does KTY=Kathy or Kentucky?

          You pulled the very same thing in the thread about Brandi writing a book about her divorce, so there is no use in even denying it. Did you forget about that post? The sad thing is that you are even using the same writing style you used then.

          When did Brandi go on twitter and bash Leann and Eddie? How odd, you expect better from Brandi because she is there mom, and yet you don’t expect better from Eddie, who is their father?

          Perhaps you should get a life fast that way you don’t keep getting upset when people see through your stunt. You should have known that this waas going to happen because when you pulled this in the other thread, it didnt go well for you.

          Of course everything you said about Leann’s success is “true”; afterall, it came straight from Leann didn’t it? I know why your post sounds so familiar.
          Isn’t there a Leann fan who always argues that Leann is rich and a “success” because she made $40million dollars a long time ago?

          Sick is thinking that you could pull the very same stunt that you did in the previous thread and that no would know it was you simply because you used a different name from what you normally used.

          Reply
          • Kty

            this is my last time responding to you…no Kty is for Cathy,i used the K on it because my brother spelled it like that…again,i never comment on any of their posts but if you want to keep acting crazy go ahead i won’t stop you…lol now i’m someone else please i always sign as Kty and i am mostly on Suri’s thread especially when adults try to bully her…have a nice day but it was funny.lol

          • Anonymous

            @1:48

            Sure, keep telling yourself that, meanwhile there are posts in the previous threads(See the thread about Brandi writing a book) that contradict your claims. It was funny? Now where have we heard this before? Isn’t there a particular poster who is always telling everyone that she likes to “bait” others because she is having fun? And of course always calling others “crazy” ? And you haven’t posted before?

      • Anonymous

        If you consider Eddie & Leann’s careers to be in the toilet, then Brandi’s must be at the bottom of the sewer. What does she *do*? She pretends to be a housewife on a pseudo-reality show about nagging, backstabbing, pretentious women who freeze up their faces and try to act like they’re 20 years old? Wow, her mama must be so proud.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          @9:48

          Why does your post sound so familiar? Because you made the same comment on Celebrity B?

          So once again it’s a case of you seeing what you want to see. Despite the fact that there is plenty of evidence to support that both Eddie and Leann’s careers are in the toilet(low ratings, show canceled jsut after 3 episodes, low ticket sales, flopped album/singles), you are going to argue otherwise? So what post 9:48 translates into is that Leann and Eddie are jealous of Brandi because her career is moving forward, while theirs has stalled. So Leann was trying to ruin Brandi’s chances on RHOBH by leaking that information to ROL.

          Leann pretends to be housewife, she nags, backstabs, has a frozen face, and acts like she 14 yo, so what is your point? So then by your logic Big Bel must me very proud of Leann, right?

          Here is evidence to once again contradict your claims that Brandi’s career is at the bottom of the sewer: “There ain’t no sunshine in that part of California. Brandi Glanville will forever be stuck bickering with Eddie Cibrian and LeAnn Rimes about their children and fame. It doesn’t matter that Cibrian and Rimes spent most of last week baking in Mexico’s sun, they still managed to cause drama in the US. Fortunately, Glanville has managed to remain the only one of them who’s had a steady job in the last few years. Cibrian and Rimes are probably just jealous because Glanville is more relevant than them.”-Gather

          Reply
        • Anonymous

          Did you see this? Guess who was listed first on the list and what photo they picked to go with the article? The article has one thing wrong though, Simon stated that it was Leann who contacted him about being on the show(not his producers) and Simon flat told TMZ that he wanted Britney as his judge. All of the articles about Leann and X Factor came from Leann herself, not Simon. It it goes to show just how good Leann is at getting the media to believe her lies, she told the lie about XFactor so much that the media bought into it even though Simon C has indicated over and over that she wasn’t the first, second, or third choice for the show.

          Celebrities pimping out personal lives to stay relevant(May 4): Forget working, many stars with stagnant careers use marriages and babies to cling to the spotlight and pay the bills.

          “There was a time when most celebrities jumped through hoops to protect their private lives but these days it seems more and more are going out of their way to make theirs public. For many, it’s less about the art anymore and more about how they can profit financially from their personal lives.The age of social networking and reality TV has created an insatiable appetite for fans eager to be voyeurs into famous people’s lives and many are only too happy to oblige. With sluggish careers, it’s often the only way they can stay relevant and enjoy the cash flow they’ve become accustomed to over the years.”

          Here are five of the most recent offenders:

          LeAnn Rimes
          “When’s the last time the country singing child-star-turned-heckled-home-wrecker had a radio hit or won an award? (And “Most Annoying Person on the Planet” doesn’t count.) That hasn’t stopped the 29-year-old from being one of the most talked about celebrities in recent years thanks to the way she’s capitalized on her highly publicized affair and subsequent marriage to actor Eddie Cibrian. Rimes is famous for inviting the paparazzi into their lives to capture the most intimate moments – including outings with her step-sons – and the more the public demands it, the higher her payout. The couple’s recent one-year wedding anniversary coverage rivaled Will and Kate’s – with Rimes tweeting obsessively about the various celebrations in the week leading up to the sacred date. And it’s paying off for the singer in more than just appearing fees and paparazzi payouts. The public’s interest in Rimes has apparently caught Simon Cowell’s eye with the starlet being considered for one of the sought-after judge’s seats on The X Factor.”

          -Source(MSN)

          Reply
    • Anonymous

      Did you read the article? Leann is photographed more with the kids because she tips off the paps. The person who took the photos of Leann “shopping” in Malibu is also the very same person who took the photos of Leann and Eddie in Cabo.

      Reply
  15. Anonymous

    No wonder Leann’s other mouthpieces haven’t posted this staged photo-ops yet, she is indeed planning on releasing more staged photo-ops. She was tweeting about their soccer games like crazy, so be prepared to see photos of Leann and Eddie making on the sidelines of his son’s soccer game and Leann playing the “devoted” bonus mom. Did Leann hire GSI to take the soccer photos as well?

    Reply
  16. Anonymous

    Nobody cares.

    Reply
  17. Anonymous

    I don’t understand How this bitch is out with the kid by herself. Isn’t it supposed to be parenting time with his father? I would be so pissed if my ex’s current piece would be parading my kids around while I only get 50 percent parenting time.

    Reply
  18. Anonymous

    Leann is setting up these staged photo-ops with the kids and is still making tweets about the boys because she is taunting Brandi, in other words she is telling Brandi that she[leann] can do whatever she pleases to and with Brandi’s kids and that there isn’t a thing Brandi can do about it. Seriously, it’s time for Brandi to put her foot down and put both Eddie and Leann in their place. She shouldn’t allow Eddie and Leann to get away with their latest round of staged photo-ops with the kids or tweets, especially when they are telling her that she can’t allow the kids to be on her show. It’s like they are testing her. Leann’s obsession with Brandi’s youngest son is creepy. She tweets about him are as if she is grooming him. If this was a grown man tweeting about a young girl like that, the media would be slamming him like crazy. So why sit back and allow Leann to do it? Leann is another Mark K Letourneau. Get the kids away from her before it’s too late.

    If Leann had any common sense at all she wouldn’t have allowed this staged photo-op to be released and she would cancel the staged soccer game photos that she is going to release either later today or on Monday. The backlash against Leann and Eddie is going to be 30X worse with the release of the staged soccer photos and once any other media outlet posts the photo of Leann “shopping” with Jake. If Eonline, People mag, Celebuzz, x17, DM, JJ, GG, HuffPo, and CBS called Leann out instead of patting her on the back, she would be less likely to continue to use those boys to taunt Brandi.

    Reply
  19. Anonymous

    Note to LeAnn: If Eddie is the best dad ever, then he would be protecting his kids from experiencing ANY TYPE of public exposure instead of allowing you to post twitpics of them on a public forum, invite GSI with you as you go “shopping” with his son, or invite the paps to his son’s game. Of course it makes you happy to see that Eddie is so bent on getting back at Brandi that he uses his own kids as weapons. But how can you trust a man who sells out his own kids or uses his own son as a weapon against his ex-wife? If Eddie can’t be loyal to his own kids, then everyone knows that he isn’t being loyal or faithful to you. So everytime you tweet about his kids, set up staged photo-ops with his kids, post twitpics of his kids, or invite the paps to any event you attend with them, you are just making it very clear that Eddie is cheating on you and that your marriage is a one big huge farce. Thanks again LeAnn for confirming what a lowlife Eddie Cibrian truly is. Why would anyone watch anything he is on when everyone knows just what a mean and nasty man he is to his children and his ex-wife?

    Reply
  20. Anonymous

    You notice Jake is always with her because Mason is old enough to say no I don’t want to go and don’t and cute little Jake can be persuaded. Poor Leann she is in for a rude awakening.I bet she had to bribe him to go with her. He knows the paps are there that’s why he’s smiling because Brandi said he is not camera shy. She will have a chance to prove what a good step mom when Mason starts asserting himself if he already hasn’t. I don’t see anything wrong with the shopping but the papping is wrong. In the end both Leann and Eddie are the losers.

    Reply
  21. Anonymous

    Get ready because some massive backlash is headed Leann and Eddie’s way. Leann just released the staged photo of her and Eddie at his son’s soccer game to JJ. And as usual she is dressed inappropriately-short shorts, no bra, sheer shirt, and engaging in pda with Eddie and hanging all over Eddie for dear life. And guess who took the photos. The same person who took the photos of Leann and Jake on Friday. GSI.

    Leann made sure that she was photographed with the oldest boy since so many have been pointing out how he hasn’t been going along with Eddie and Leann. What makes it even gross is the fact that Leann is putting food into Brandi’s son’s mouth like she is his mother.Eddie is wearing a cross as if that makes the exploitation of the boys okay. They also made sure to get a lot of shots of Brandi as if that makes it okay to take photos of the boys.

    No doubt that the staged “happy family” photo-op is damage control for Eddie and Leann trying to restrict Brandi from having the kids on her show. What a low life, these staged photo-ops with Brandi and the kids look contrived and Eddie and Leann are really stupid if they think these staged photo-ops will undo the story that they fed to ROL. Seriously Brandi needs to put her foot down. That’s two staged photo-ops in a matter of just one day. Leann is counting on Brandi not doing anything, now is the time to protect those kids.

    I love how Brandi and Eddie are matching in the photos, both wearing blue. Didn’t they do that at the last soccer game? So even though Eddie is married to Leann, he is still in tune with Brandi.

    Reply
  22. Anonymous

    Get ready because some massive backlash is headed Leann and Eddie’s way. Leann just released the staged photo of her and Eddie at his son’s soccer game to JJ. And as usual she is dressed inappropriately-short shorts, no bra, sheer shirt, and engaging in pda with Eddie and hanging all over Eddie for dear life. And guess who took the photos. The same person who took the photos of Leann and Jake on Friday. GSI.

    Leann made sure that she was photographed with the oldest boy since so many have been pointing out how he hasn’t been going along with Eddie and Leann. What makes it even gross is the fact that Leann is putting food into Brandi’s son’s mouth like she is his mother.Eddie is wearing a cross as if that makes the exploitation of the boys okay. They also made sure to get a lot of shots of Brandi as if that makes it okay to take photos of the boys.

    No doubt that the staged “happy family” photo-op is damage control for Eddie and Leann trying to restrict Brandi from having the kids on her show. What a low life, these staged photo-ops with Brandi and the kids look contrived and Eddie and Leann are really stupid if they think these staged photo-ops will undo the story that they fed to ROL. Seriously Brandi needs to put her foot down. That’s two staged photo-ops in a matter of just one day. Leann is counting on Brandi not doing anything, now is the time to protect those kids.

    I love how Brandi and Eddie are matching in the photos, both wearing blue. Didn’t they do that at the last soccer game? So even though Eddie is married to Leann, he is still in tune with Brandi.

    Reply
  23. Anonymous

    Leann is a vile human. Not surprised to hear this is a set up. One look at her twitter and how she obsesses over Brandi’s sons reveals her immaturity and psychotic nature. Leann- you are not there mother and the older son ALWAYS looks miserable and painfully uncomfortable around you. Copying Brandi’s tweets about her sons such as your “I’d do anything for those boys” after brandi tweeted similar language on friday and pretending your their mommy doesn’t mean you’re doing a good job as a wife, or step parent. Actions speak louder than words. So shut up and go to intensive counseling and try being a better person before its too late.

    Reply
  24. Anonymous

    I’d believe Leann and Eddie were more in love if they didn’t spend all their time either planning photo-ps or posing for photogs. Seriously, it’s all they do! It seems fitting that their photog friend was at their vow-renewal and anniversary vacay given that he’s spent as much time with them this last year as they have with each other!! I wonder if he also had to renew his vows to respond to every inane tip-off from Leann about her whereabouts shoppping, cheering at Jake’s games and posing ever-so-naturally in a bikini?!

    Reply
  25. Anonymous

    Leann is just plain gross. Radaronline just posted a photo of Leann with her hand in Eddie’s lap. It’s obvious what she was doing. Now why does she pick his son’s soccer game to do these sexual acts to Eddie? What type of man is Eddie that he allows Leann to do that type of stuff to him at a child’s soccer game? And she is all over Eddie in the photo too like she is a dog marking it’s territory. And then they have the nerve to be concerned about the influence of RHOBH on the kids? She is engaging in some inappropriate behavior with Eddie on a field with children.

    Reply
  26. Anonymous

    Interesting, Just Jared didn’t even post the photo of Leann with her hand in Eddie’s lap, which means that even they were embarrased by what Leann was doing to Eddie and thought that it was inappropriate.

    Reply
  27. Anonymous

    Ugg they are all vile the point of the story is this woman STAGES her photo opportunitys with the paps
    these people obviously get a thrill by seeing themselves in tabloids
    its a sickness

    Reply
  28. Anonymous9

    Neither of these people are worth writing a novel over in the comments section of a baby website.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      This.

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      Uh-oh… now Kooky McKooky is going to write ANOTHER novel saying that if “they’re not worth writing a novel over” then why are you posting and defending Leann? LOL LOL LOL

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        @2:29

        KOOKY MCKOOKY: When YOU try to save face by calling other posters names and then make comments to yourself to make it look like other posters agree with you.

        KOOKY MCKOOKY: When you whine about how others are posting despite the fact that you have already made over 7 posts.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          And off she goes!

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            @9:31

            And off YOU go! So it looks like you are back to the name calling and “you need help” posts. What’s the matter, you still can’t come up with anything to valid to defend Leann?

          • Anonymous

            Leann doesn’t need me to defend her, any more than Brandi needs you to defend her. Can’t figure out why you think you’re performing some kind of public service here, but it’s fun, so what the heck…

          • Anonymous

            @9:33

            Why are Leann’s fan’s such hypocrites? In one breath they want to lecture others for posting, and in the very next breath they will justify their actions by claiming that they post each and everyday (making 5-6 posts/visit) because “it’s fun”.Now the last time you used the “it’s fun baiting” excuse, you went berserk because I told you that that type of behavior wasn’t normal and that you only result to the “it’s fun baiting” line because you are trying to save face. But thanks again for proving my point, that you are indeed the one posing as all these different posters.

            And yet you keep coming back each and everyday to make posts in defense of Leann, from trashing Brandi to calling other posters names. Perhaps we can ask you the same thing, why do you think you are performing some kind of public service here for Leann? Is that what bothers you? The fact that people don’t care enough about Leann to defend her?

            Well you also kept telling me that bait and switch didn’t mean what it meant, despite the fact that TWO sources contradicted, so I’m not at all surprised by the fact that you can’t figure out why anyone would challenge your posts, especially the ones where you depict Brandi as the villian just to make Leann look like a decent person. So that is what this is about? You are upset because I called you out for your bait and switch post?

    • Anonymous

      @12:14

      Haven’t we heard this before from you and then you show up each and everyday to make 5-6 posts each time you make a visit?

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Just because you think it’s all the same person doesn’t make it true, no matter how many times you keep saying it.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          @6:24

          Well that’s odd because you didn’t say that in the previous thread. In fact you stated that you doubted that there would more than 6 people posting in these threads because no one cares, and now you are singing a different tune.Serioulsy you do this in every thread. Plus we have seen you pull the stunt where you make posts to yourself several times? You make a post and then when you come back and see that no one has supported you, you make the “Kooky”/”crazy” post. If you don’t want to be called out for posing as different posters, then stop doing it.

          Perhaps you should learn to be think before you post.

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            Someday, this site will require users to login or track IP addresses, then you’ll finally understand that there are hundreds of people who post here and everyone who disagrees with you is not the same person.

            Perhaps you should seek psychological help. I hear there are new medications that work wonders for people who are delusional, obsessive and bi-polar.

          • Anonymous

            @7:17

            You do this all the time. How many times have we seen you write the “you need help” post? It also doesn’t help your case when the threads are quiet for 2-3 days and then all of a sudden they are bombared with 2-5 “different” posters who resort to name calling, trashing Brandi, claiming that someting either doesn’t mean what it means, or whining about about how no one cares. It’s common sense. Think before you post. You are your own worst enemy because you keep providing the evidence against yourself. Look at how you kept arguing that “bait and switch” was only exclusive to retail, even when you were giving example after example to disprove you.

            Once again, you are singing a different tune? One minute you claim that you doubt that there are more than 6 people posting in these threads because no one cares enough to post, and then the next you are screaming that there are thousands that post here? BTW, why does the “there are thousands who post here post” sound so familiar? Because we have seen you make that post how many times before? Perhaps you should seek psychological help. I hear there are new medications that work wonders for people who are delusional, obsessive and bi-polar. That way you won’t have to keep sining a different tune.

            Thanks for proving my point, you post the “and she is off…” comment and then follow it up with posts about how people “need to seek help”. And then you just can’t figure out why everyone knows it’s just you posing as many different posters. It also doesn’t help your case that you slipped up when you were posting as Grace. You do remember what you did that made it very clear that you are posting under several different names right?

          • Anonymous

            So it hasn’t occurred to you that MULTIPLE PEOPLE think you need help? How sad for you. :(

          • Anonymous

            @9:34

            Well it’s obvious that you need help. Why else would you keep telling us that you are not posting under all these different names when you do this in EVERY thread? So let me guess, you didn’t make posts 9:32 or 9:33 either right? So it hasn’t occured to you that NO ONE is buying your “MUTIPLE PEOPLE are posting here” campaign because YOU keep providing evidence against yourself? Like the whole GRACE thing(I asked Grace a question, an “anon” poster shows up answering the question and tells me that she answered the question because I asked “them” the question, I then reposted the question and pointed out that I asked GRACE the question(not them), which means that GRACE was the anon poster)? And the fact that you yourself stated that you didn’t believe that more than 6 people posted in these threads? Or the fact that you do this in everythread? Or the fact that just min before/after posting in these threads Janna/NYCMommy will pop up in another thread, signaling that it’s her. Or that the posts that you are making here are the very same ones you made when you were going by Janna/NYCMommy in these threads? Or the fact that NYCMommy stated that she could post as anon and that no one would know that it was her?

            How sad for you :( Well you also kept trying to tell me that bait and switch didn’t mean what it meant, so I’m not surprised that you are going to keep arguing that there are “thousands” posting despite the fact that you have provided plenty of evidence to support that this isn’t the case.

  29. Anonymous

    Whenever you these staged photo-ops of Leeanne Rhymes with Eddie’s kids, you have to ask yourself: What did she give Eddie to make him sell out his kisd? So Leeanne promised to “buy” Eddie a NEW house. And that is why he has no qualms allowing Leann to use his kids to taunt his ex. Hopefully the new house that Leann “buys” for Eddie will have a private wing for Eddie’s mistresses, that way Eddie never ever has to leave the house. And while he is having sexy time with his mistress, Leeanne can play with the pet pig she has been begging Eddie to buy. This is precisely why Eddie has so much bad luck with getting people to watch anything he is in. He sold his kids out for a HOUSE.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      Maybe she gives an amazing blowjob?

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Well according to her interview on Chelsea Lately, Leann said that Eddie didn’t like her BJ and that was the real reason she had to get mouth surgery. If that was the case, Eddie wouldn’t have cheated on Leann in 2009 with Scheana. And Eddie wouldn’t be sleeping with Lizzy, the woman had a makeout session with on a balcony while Eddie watched.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          Even though she was joking, anything you can do to give a better blowjob is good for everyone. Hope they’re both enjoying the new sensations!

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            Leann wasn’t joking, just look at how she went and got breast implants the same size as Eddie’s ex-wife. How she dyes her hair the same color as Brandi’s. Was that a joke too?Unfortunately Eddie still isn’t satisfied, didn’t Leann just have another mouth surgery? Poor Leann always striving to be “perfect” for Eddie, but never acheiving that goal. Eddie is enjoying the sensations, but it’s not coming from Leann. Word is Eddie is having an affair with Lizzy, the woman Leann made out with while Eddie watched.

          • Anonymous

            Sounds like they’re BOTH doing to deed with Lizzy. Good for them, the only thing better than two is three! Maybe Leann’s mouth is better suited to…. different…. genitalia. ;-)

          • Anonymous

            Is that what Leann is telling you now? Leann didn’t like the idea that people thought she had something going on with Lizzy, did you see the tantrum she threw on twitter, claiming that people were readiing TOO MUCH into it and it was just a joke?

          • Anonymous

            Yeah, Leann Rimes is sitting right next to me telling me what to write.

            Idiot.

          • Anonymous

            Well you did come back and make another post, so it’s more than obvious that Leann is telling you what to say. Calling other posters names when you can’t come up with anything valid to say is your “trademark”. BTW, why does the “Leann is sitting next to me telling what to say” post sound so familiar? So why do you boo hoo about how there are thousands posting in this thread, when you are just going to keep posting the very same things we saw you post in the previous threads.

            BTW, I said is that what Leann is TELLING YOU NOW and then I followed it up with information that contradicted your post. Now how did you get “Leann is sitting next to you” out of “telling you now”? See that is what I love about you Leann “fans”, your quilty conscience gets the best of you all the time and you tell on yourself and Leann. So thanks for admitting that Leann is sitting next to you as you write these posts in her defense.

          • Anonymous

            The world can only pray that you are infertile, because I’d really hate to think of you reproducing and populating the planet with your insanity.

          • Anonymous

            @9:50

            So Leann is speaking from personal experience. No wonder Leann is so obsessed with Eddie’s youngest son, Eddie Cibrian is very verbally abusive and told her, “The world can only pray that you are infertile, because I’d really hate to think of you reproducing and populating the planet with your insanity”. Or is this what Eddie Cibrian told you when he sent you that text, “The world can only pray that you are infertile, because I’d really hate to think of you reproducing and populating the planet with your insanity.”

            How typical, you get caught in a lie and you resort to insults as if that has the power to fix your mistake. You are the one who keeps posting, so don’t get mad when your “bright ideas” blow up in your face. You do this in every thread, you shouldn’t be surprised by the outcome of your posts. Wait, now where have we heard the “infertile” post before? That’s right, you have written that a lot on twitter using various different names. Didn’t you even use the post to harass Brandi? Thanks for confirming which “fans” you are posing as on twitter. With “fans” like you Leann doesn’t need any enemies.
            And then you just can’t figure out why Leann continues to get so much backlash.

            I must have hit the nail on the head on about Leann telling you what to write because all of a sudden now you are too busy to pose as the other different posters in this thread. Do your the other writers on this site, know that you are making posts? Do the other writers know that you are Leann’s contact?

          • Anonymous

            To 9:50

            Didn’t you write the very same thing on twitter when you were going by the name of Ghostsighs?

          • Anonymous

            Obviously Eddie must think the same of LeMann Rhimes.

          • Anonymous

            To 7:57

            Don’t you sit on twitter calling other posters “idiot” when they won’t accept the truth that you and Leeanne Rhymes are selling?

  30. Anonymous

    It’s really just too easy.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      @1:18

      Wow, you came back and made another post? If it was all too easy, then you wouldn’t still be using the very same lines that you post in just about every thread. How many times have we heard this “too easy” line from you?So as usual you pull out the “too easy” line because sounds you still can’t come up with anything to post.

      Hey, how come all those “thousands” of other posters who you claim are posting in this thread disappeared when you did? And then you can’t understand why everyone knows it’s just one Leann fan posing as mutiple people.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Keep it coming.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          @4:21

          Is that the best you can do? Oh wait, Leann and her fans aren’t very bright, so in your mind “keep it coming” really is the best you could do. Wow, you gotta love these Leann fans, if you are so above it all, you wouldn’t be posting in the first place. Well one thing is for sure, there weren’t “thousands” posting, just you pretending to be mutiple posters. Keep it coming, the more you post today, the better!!!!! Let’s see if you can figure out why the posts you are leaving today works against you.

          Reply
          • No Holds Barred

            It is the best I can do. I’m not very bright. Everything works against me. The crushing weight of Leann and Brandi’s war is really getting to me and I feel I can’t escape it. I see no way out. I am humbled by your genius and your knowledge of every single aspect of all of their lives. I wish I had your commitment to the cause.

          • Anonymous

            You gotta love these Leann fans. This one seems to think that she is being funny by posting comments such as 4:57, but all she just proved is that there weren’t “thousands” posting in this thread, just her posing as different people. Just look at how she used two different names to make the posts on Tuesday. Thanks for proving our point. It’s just been ONE Leann fan the whole time!!! If she were smart, she would understand why her posts work against her. Poor Leann, no wonder her career is in the toilet.

          • Anonymous

            You come back each and everyday to make 2-6 posts/visit, so what do you mean you wish you had the commitment to the cause? Why are Leann’s fans so hypocritical? Now let’s just see how committed you are to the cause when you come back today and make even more posts.

          • TwinkleToes

            I personally AM very committed. You personally should BE committed. But I don’t hate ya, without you, my days would be long and dull. So I actually owe you a debt of gratitude!

          • Anonymous

            @9:48

            Says the person who keeps coming back to this thread each and everyday to make posts in response to herself to make it look like others support her and will use 4-5 different names and then get mad because people call her out for posing as mutiple posters.

            So is that what Eddie told Leann, that he wants to have her committed? So Eddie thinks that his days with Leann are long and dull? So Leann is just having you write what a verbally abusive Eddie told her? HAHAHAHAHAHAH I guess Eddie does owe Leann a debt of gratitude, without her money, seeing as how she is financially supporting him. So what else will Leann send you here to write?

            There you go again trying to save face because you STILL can’t come up with anything valid. And the sad part is that your saving face comments, are just what a verbally abusive Eddie told Leann. Keep up the good work and thanks for confirming that Leann’s marriage to Eddie is just one big farce.

        • Anonymous

          @4:21

          Didn’t you write the very same thing when you were posting on twitter as ghostsighs?

          Reply
  31. Anonymous

    Leann has a new tactic. Leann is releasing negative stories about Brandi via Radaronline and Celebuzz, BEFORE she releases her staged photo-ops with Brandi and Eddie’s kids. Leann has set up a “Mother’s Day” staged photo-op with Brandi’s kids for today, knowing that she will get backlash for this, what does Leann do? Hours before she releases the staged “Mother’s Day” photo-op with Brandi’s kids, Leann paid Radaronline to write a negative story about Brandi using a interview from 3 years ago.

    If Leann truly loved the boys, why would she continue to set up the staged photo-ops with the boys and in the process try to justify it by having Radaronline or Celebuzz depict their mother as the villian as if this will make what she is doing okay?

    Brandi needs to seriously get those kids away from Leann because Leann is sinking to all new lows.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      And so on and so on…..

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAnd the sad part is that you STILL don’t get why the 3 posts that you have made today work against you. And you said that “thousands” post in this thread and the entire time it was just you posing as other posters, just like I said. Strange how these “other” posters disappear when you do and return when you do?

        So Leann is going to release a staged photo-op to this site, and you would know this because you are her contact?

        So how long are you going to keep this up? You are still upset over the fact that Brandi is getting support, so I predict that you will keep posting in this thread for another month. You can’t let Leann down. I love how after I point out that Leann is telling you what to say, you start leaving these off the wall comments.

        Reply
        • Mama Mia

          Yes, I am upset at the support Brandi is getting. It has so traumatized my life that I’m almost suicidal because I’ve let Leann down. Whatever shall I do? Help me!

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            You gotta love these Leann fans. This one seems to think that she is being funny by posting comments such as 4:56 and 4:57, but all she just proved is that there weren’t “thousands” posting in this thread, just her posing as different people. Just look at how she used two different names to make the posts on Tuesday. Thanks for proving our point. It’s just been ONE Leann fan the whole time!!! If she were smart, she would understand why her posts work against her. Poor Leann, no wonder her career is in the toilet.

          • SomePeople

            Sweetheart, the only people still visiting this thread are clearly you and I. Doesn’t mean that you and I are the only ones that EVER visited this website.

            I’m just glad you’re sticking it out with me. I’d hate to think that my posts go unnoticed. I’m so glad you enjoy our banter as much as I do! We should join up and start a new website, then we’d never be without each other. We could do an Angelina vs Jennifer site! A Brandi vs Leann site! A Tori vs whatever-his-first-wife’s-name-was site!

            What do you say? :)

          • Anonymous

            Rest assured, there are still others (or at least one other) following along. I find the obviously demented pathology of our Brandi superfan endlessly fascinating.

          • Anonymous

            @4:44

            Says the person who keeps coming back each and everyday to make 2-6 posts/visist? The very same person who argued that “bait and switch” didn’t mean what it meant even after given THREE examples to contradict her posts. The very same person who rewrite history even when the evidence is right there to contradict her.

            Our? Everyone knows that it’s just YOU, the ONE Leann fan posing as mutiple posters to make it look like Leann has support. I must have struck a nerve because here you are pulling out another “fascinating” and “entertaining” post just like you do on twitter. So what upset you? Was it the fact that I was right about how Leann is telling you what to say? Or are you upset because of all the backlash you experienced on twitter today?

            Following along? But that isn’t what you said. You said that there were “thousands” POSTING in this thread. Why are you always rewriting history? So now are going to argue that you said “following” along when everyone can clearly see your posts where you flat out say that “others” are posting.

            I find the obviously demented pathology of our Brandi superhater endlessly fascinating. She was the one who decided to keep posting and now she is upset because it just proves that it’s been her this whole time posting as all those other mutiple posters. The sad part is that she thought that she was being funny by using 3 different names to make posts today and yesterday, but all she proved was that she has no qualms about using mutiple names when she needs to.

            The , Brandisuperhater, who is also a writer for this site and Leann’s contact, is either trying to get the thread closed down or she is thinks that she can make Leann popular by getting the thread to over 100 posts. She did the same thing before, and it backfired because even after having over 100 posts in the thread, the site still didn’t include Leann on their most popular list.

            With all the backlash you got on twitter, it’s no wonder you are hanging here.

          • Anonymous

            To 4:44

            HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Wow, haven’t we seen this before? You make comments in support of yourself to give the impression that other posters agree with you. But you ruined that because those “other” posters ALL disappeared when you did. How funny that they come out of hiding when you are being blasted for posing as all these other posters. It’s funny you speak of demented, when it’s YOU who is making comments to yourself because you slipped up and made it very obvious that it’s been you posing as mutiple posters this whole time.

          • Anonymous

            To 4:44

            Our? So then you do work for this site as everyone suspected. Thanks for confirming. So are you Leanne’s contact, the person she was seen tweeting to from this site?

          • KatieG

            I’m glad I’m not the only one who will admit to following along!

          • Anonymous

            Yeah, I suspect there are quite a lot of people reading but not commenting. At this point I’m trying to keep from actually engaging with the crazy directly, but it’s still fun to follow along with anyone who’s willing to brave the direct interaction. Who doesn’t love a massive, flaming, gory internet trainwreck?

          • Anonymous

            @12:14

            Fun to follow along? Why does that sound SO familiar? Because we have heard you use that line how many times? And then you just can’t understand why everyone suspects that you are posing as all these mutiple posters.

            HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA NOW you “suspect” that a lot of people are reading but not commenting? Funny how you always switch and sing a different tune when you get caught in some major lies.

            Well you are having conversations with yourself, so that is directly engaging with the crazy. I love your hypocrisy. So when others make a comment to you it’s because they are crazy? But when someone applies your very own logic to you, once again your tune changes?

          • Anonymous

            KatieG, as in KTYG????? So are you the same person who was posting as KTYG just last week?

          • KatieB

            That anybody can post…..

          • KatieC

            With any name they choose?

          • Anonymous

            To KatieA, KatieB, Katie C

            You do realize…that you made the very same comment when you were posting as “I Can Name Myself Whatever I Want”, right?

          • Well I **CAN** Name Myself Whatever I Want

            Duh.

          • Anonymous

            Thanks for admitting that you are posting under several different names just like we said you were!!!!And the sad thing is that you really thought that post 9:56 was a clever response. You whine about how there are other posters posting, only to turn around and ruin your argument by writing posts like 9:56. HAHAHAHA

          • Anonymous

            Wow, you came back and made another post using yet another different name?

            So when caught in yet another lie, your tune changes yet again. That isn’t what you said. Go back and read what you posted. You stated that there were “thousands” POSTING in this thread and then when the evidence shows that it was just YOU posing as different people, now you are going to claim that you said “visisting”? Why do you do that, especially when people can clearly see your posts? Do you have a hard time understanding your own posts? Or do you just see what you want to see?

            Of course you Love to banter, from what I heard you do a lot of it on twitter and various other sites, you even open up fake accounts in Brandi’s name.

            Thanks for acknowledging that it’s been YOU, ONE Leann fan posing as mutiple people this entire time, and not the “thousands” that you orginally claimed.

            Of course you are going to keep coming back and making posts, you do this ALL THE TIME at Leann’s request of course. You are even using the very same posts that you used the last time you went berserk like this. Poor Stace2u or is Drp2u2u?

          • Anonymous

            To the poster (the person who made post 4:56 and 5:57)who claims that she isn’t dedicated to the cause despite the fact that she comes back each and everyday to make a post because that is what people do when they are not dedicated to a cause:

            What shall you do? Well we do know that after you were slammed for leaking information to Celebuzz and someone posted a video you made hating on Leann and Eddie before you “saw the light” and became a Brandi basher about that you changed your name. Seeing as how you used two different names to make posts in this thread, then we know that this is where you are headed.

          • TwinkleToes

            Who said I wasn’t dedicated to the cause?!?! I certainly am!!!

          • Anonymous

            @9:45

            Wow, you came back with a different name and once again arguing that your post doesn’t say what it says. And then you can’t figure out why people say that you are posing as mutiple posters or know that it’s you posting all these comments.

      • Anonymous

        @4:22

        You wrote the very same thing on twitter when you were posting as ghostsighs.

        Reply
  32. anon

    Leanne is really starting to lose the plot. I had a suspicion she was planning to release some pics when returning home. But mothers day pics, that insane. She is not doing right by the kids, they serve as a platform for her agenda. It’s certainly going to backfire and then she’s going to be even more focused to exact more revenge towards Brandi. Brandi really has a obsessed bitter fan in leanne. Ediot is no longer a actor but a full time unemployed poser. Both him and leanne are 2 sunken turdles in the toilet bowl stinking up the restroom and their antics are the chain that is due to flush them and their non careers at any given second. Leanne and Ediot need to leave the children out of their twisted games. Stop the hurt and go about their lives together.

    Reply
  33. Anonymous

    We did it! Over 100+ comments, the most of any thread this month!!

    Reply
    • anonymous2

      We did it??? it is my understanding all these posts are just two people (according to TEAM BRANDE) one from each side… LOL

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        @5:52

        HaHAHAHAHAHA There you go AGAIN making comments in response to yourself. You are the one who keeps providing the evidence to support that it’s just you using several different names. Take for instance how you showed up last week and used 2 different names.

        Reply
    • Anonymous

      To 2:29

      We? Everyone knows it’s just YOU, the ONE Leann fan who pretends to be mutiple posters because Leann’s fanbase is just that low.

      100 posts and this site still hasn’t put Leann in it’s top celeb list and Leann still isn’t popular or well liked.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Not popular? Every post about her has more comments than any other celeb.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          @6:48

          HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA No wonder Leann’s career is in the toilet. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH having more comments than any other celeb=popularity? HAHAHAHAHAHA Even though Leann’s album and 3 singles flopped, despite the fact that she received more comments than any other celeb? Wow, there is something wrong with your logic. Well you are the same person who kept arguing that “bait and switch” didn’t mean what it meant, even though you were given 2 examples contradicting you. HAHAHAHAHA Leann has how many twitter followers? Less than 300,000. So what does that tell you? If Leann was popular, wouldn’t that be reflected in her twitter followers? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          And it’s even better, Leann is SO popular because according to the Leann fan, having more comments=popularity, that Simon C hired her to be a judge on his show. Oh wait that didn’t happen did it. That’s odd. Why wouldn’t Simon C hire Leann, who is “popular”?

          Did you hear what happened on The Dailymail, a comment stating that no one likes Leann and that they want her to disappear was reported to have gotten over 1600 likes. Now if Leann was popular people wouldn’t be supporting comments like that. Plus, Leann and Eddie are always rated in the top 5 most annoying HW couples because no one likes them. They can’t even get viewers because people just don’t like them. Eddie’s show was canceled after 3 episodes and just after Eddie and NBC had annouced that Leann was going guest appear on the show with Eddie. And yet you still want to argue that Leann is popular? HAHAHAH

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            Well, she’s popular enough that YOU can’t seem to stop commenting, and you know what they say: There’s no such thing as bad publicity!

          • Anonymous

            There you go again, singing a different tune to fit into your fairytale. Since YOU can’t stop commenting about Brandi on twitter, Celebuzz, ROL, and on this site, then by your own logic that makes Brandi popular, right?

            There is no such thing as bad publicity? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA If you truly thought that there was no such thing as bad publicity, you wouldn’t constantly be using the “Leann is popular because she has more comments than any other celeb” line. You are just upset because once again, the evidence contradicts you. Perhaps you should think before you post. If there is no such thing as bad publicity, then why did Leann’s albums and singles flop? Why didn’t XFactor pick Leann as their judge? Why was Eddie’s show canceled after just 3 episodes? Why the ratings for Eddie’s show dropped when it was annouced that Leann would be on the show? Why Eddie wasn’t asked to return to CSI Miami? Why every show that Eddie appears on ends up canceled or with low ratings? Why the EIC had to apologize to their readers for putting Leann on their cover? Why Leann sets up charity photo-ops after one of her pr stunts backfires? Why Leann pays certain sites to write nice things about her? Why Leann sends her fans to these sites to defend her? Why Leann wasn’t invited to the Billboards awards or nominated for a Grammy? Why Leann is riding the coattails of Kim K and various other singers?

            Seriously, you are in no position to talk about how anyone is still posting, when you yourself are coming back each and everyday to leave 2-6 comments/visit. Interesting how you have been going berserk since I pointed out how Leann must be telling you what to post.

          • Anonymous

            To:2:27

            That is the major downfall of Leann and her pr people. Leann’s YES people(ie-Stace, DB, her mother, Eddie, the media outlets that she pays) underestimate just how disliked Leann truly is. Or perhaps just like the Brandi superhater, they only see what they want to see. Leann and her pr people seem to think that if they pay the right media outlets to say the right thing or release enough photos of Leann posing next to people in wheelchairs or sick children that it will fix her image. They have been doing this since what…? 2009? And it hasn’t helped Leann one bit. She is even more disliked than ever, so much so that she has to send her fan to sites like this to write posts about how she wants to see more photos of Leann. Which is a silly move considering that a comment stating that Leann needs to disappear received over 1600 likes. But then again the SuperBrandihater, isn’t every bright, hence why she keeps posting the very same thing she stated in the thread where Leann and Eddie are exploiting Eddie’s kids at the airport. You would think that after all this time, she would have something different to say, seeing as how when she said it in that thread, it didn’t help Leann. It’s interesting watching the SuperBrandihater pull all the stunts we have seen her pull before as if it will once and for all, save Leann. How many times does she have to write the “I want to see more photos of Leann…”?. Which is funny. Did you notice that for this photo-op, this site posted the article about how Leann sets up staged photo-ops with the pap from the previous thread where Leann set up the staged photo-op at Eddie’s son’s soccer game, which was posted in response to the SuperBrandihater’s claims that Leann is popular.

            Leann must be gearing up for some super massive staged photo-op for the holiday because her fan is going berserk and they usually do that when Leann has something like that planned. Considering that all of Leann’s staged photo-ops result in backlash, they should reconsider.

  34. Anonymous

    {Sigh}

    I hope there are new photos of Leann and her beautiful family soon because I feel like this thread is dying out, which bums me out. Where else can you get this kind of entertainment value… for free?!?

    Hopefully, she’ll get pregnant soon and have a daughter and their little family will be complete. That ought to make our super-fan’s head explode!

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      @2:32

      Sigh? As if in “ghostsighs”?

      HAHAHAHAHA Our? Who is OUR? Are you talking about you and Leann? Or are you once again confirming the fact that you work for this site? Well we already know that your head has exploded. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
      You are such a creature of habit. And as usual you pull out the “I am a fan of Leann’s and want to see more photos of Leann…”. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA How many times have we seen you write this very same post? Seriously, and every time you make this post it’s because you are trying to save face because your “Leann is popular” post backfired. Poor Leann, she gets the most comments, and yet she isn’t popular? Whatever will the Leann fan do? Write posts about how she wants to see more photos of Leann. HAHAHAHAHA

      Of course Leann is going to get pregnant. Eddie is cheating on her, and in Leann’s mind she probably thinks a baby can fix the problems in her marriage. So Leann is telling you that she wants to have a daughter for Eddie? As if having a daughter will make Eddie stop cheating? HAHAHAHA

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Your maniacally laughing is… creepy.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          Everything that person writes is creepy.

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            @9:48

            Wow, so after lecturing others about making posts on this site, you came back the very next day and made 3 more posts? And you don’t find that to be creepy? Of course you don’t because the rules that you impose on others don’t seem to apply to you for some reason. You are sitting here making comments in support of yourself and you want to write a post about what someone else does is creepy? Do you know what is funny? That you spent all this time doing this very same thing in the previous thread only to be betrayed by your peer writers who posted one of the articles that was used to contradict your claims when they did the write up for this staged photo-op. So obviously it’s YOU who is coming off as creepy, but then again you aren’t very bright, which is why you continue to make posts to yourself when everyone knows by now that it’s just one Leann posing as mutiple people.

            You came right back to this site, saw that you didn’t have anyone supporting you, and once again made yet another response to yourself. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

            That must be one major mega media blitz that Leann set up because you wouldn’t be going berserk like this if it wasn’t.

        • Anonymous

          @9:08

          Weren’t you just lecturing others about coming back and making posts? And here you are today making 3 more posts? Even going so far as to comment to yourself? Now that is creepy. At some point don’t you think you should at least practice what you preach? You do see how silly you are making yourself look? You were whining about how people are posting in this thread, only to come back and make even more posts the very next day?

          So what you are really saying is that you are highly upset because someone laughed at the major flaws in your logic? Woe is the BrandiSuperhater, how dare anyone laugh at her attempts to convince people that Leann is popular just because she gets more comments than any other celeb, despite the fact that just about everything she touches flops, a comment on another site stating that Leann needs to disappear receivedWait, but you manically laugh(Did you forget about those posts?), you even write things like “SIGH”, so then by your own logic you are CREEPY?

          Reply
        • Anonymous

          @9:08

          Weren’t you just lecturing others about coming back and making posts? And here you are today making 3 more posts? Even going so far as to comment to yourself? Now that is creepy. At some point don’t you think you should at least practice what you preach? You do see how silly you are making yourself look? You were whining about how people are posting in this thread, only to come back and make even more posts the very next day?

          So what you are really saying is that you are highly upset because someone laughed at the major flaws in your logic? Woe is the BrandiSuperhater, how dare anyone laugh at her attempts to convince people that Leann is popular just because she gets more comments than any other celeb, despite the fact that just about everything she touches flops, a comment on another site stating that Leann needs to disappear receivedWait, but you manically laugh(Did you forget about those posts?), you even write things like “SIGH”, so then by your own logic you are CREEPY?

          Reply
  35. Anonymous

    I hope this kid’s mother keeps him off that awful show. Being surrounded by those plastic whore women is no place for a small child!!

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      @7:44

      The child is ALREADY on a awful show that requires him to be surrounded by plastic whore women(Leann and Lizzy had a orgy on the balcony while the kids were just a few feet away), it’s called the LEANN RIMES show. So why did you write the post declaring that you wanted to see more photos of Leann, if you think that being surrounded by whore women is no place for a small child?

      Seriously, what women on RHOBH have presented themselves in that manner? Dana and Kim were shown with their boyfriends. Kyle, Lisa, and Andriene are married. Brandi’s boyfriends weren’t talked about on the show. Camille’s boyfriend was mentioned. So what show are you watching where you see these women acting in that manner? So you have a problem with the kids being seen on this show, but you don’t have a problem with them being seen with Leann and Eddie who have demonstrated some very inappropriate behavior, including doing threesomes in front of the kids?

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        Threesomes in front of the kids? Where do we get to see THOSE photos?!?!?

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA You are so predictable. You made the very same post in the previous thread when I pointed out that you have no room to criticize Brandi for being on RHOBH or writing a book because Leann and Eddie are having druken orgies in front of the kids. Seriously, and you came back and made another post? But not just any post, one that we have seen from you before. HAHAHAHAHAHA And After you whined about how others were creepy? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          You have a problem with women on RHOBH, yet you don’t have a problem seeing four adults(Leann, Eddie, Liz, and Liz’s husband) acting inappropriately in the presence of young children?

          So now you are trying to convince people that you are a fan of Leann’s by pretending not to know where to find photos of her? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA You whined about how you were being laughed at and then you show up yet again pulling the very same stunt. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          Reply
      • Anonymous

        So because their FATHER allows them to be surrounded by trash, you think their MOTHER should allow it as well? That’s just nuts.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          @12:28

          You are the one who has written how many posts now about how you want to see more photos of Leann and Eddie? What is nuts that after you whined about how people are posting in this thread, you come back yet again the very next day to make even more posts.

          But then again things aren’t looking good for Leann is it?

          Reply
        • Anonymous

          To

          Didn’t you make the very same post earlier on in this thread when you were posting as KTGRACE and KTY? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
          With fans like you, Leann doesn’t need enemies. You are even using the very same words and wording that you used in those posts. HAHAHAHAHA
          Wow, just, wow. And you just can’t figure out why everyone knows that it’s posing as several different posters. You must have forgotten about those posts because why esle would you be dumb enough to make this posts AGAIN when you already stated the very same thing using two different names?

          Reply
  36. Anonymous

    Phil Phillips won American Idol last night, and I ‘heard’ that he’s doing a duet with Leann Rimes!! How cool with that be?? Congratulations, Phil!

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      By “heard” you mean that Leann Rimes told you? You pulled the very same thing on several other sites about how Leann was doing a duet with Rob Thomas. So Leann’s rep and career is so bad that now she is trying to ride the coattails of people from American Idol? Congrats Phil? More like he might want to reconsider associating with Leann. XFactor did. They saw just how disliked Leann was and how she encourages her fans. Just think that every post you make on this site, reflects poorly on Phil.

      Poor Leann. She STILL can’t get people interested in her music, and she thinks that she can get Phil to help her sing about her affair with Eddie? Phil is going to get slammed.

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      No wonder Leann sent her fan here to write a post about how she is doing a duet with the winner from American Idol. Did you see the headlines today? Britney and Demi are getting attention for being on Xfactor. You do remember XFactor, right? Leann told x17 that she was in meetings with Nigel L all day, but then she had x17 edit the article when many people pointed out that Leann was lying because Nigel does’t have anything to do with XFactor. So Leann is jealous, but then again Leann has no one to blame but herself. She lost the juding job on XFactor because of her bad behavior.

      Reply
  37. Anonymous

    Is Phil ready for the backlash that is going to come Leann’s way? Leann paid The EvilStepmother blog to write a fluffpiece saying that Leann was a role model for stepmothers. Yes Leann Rimes, the same Leann Rimes who very publicly encouraged her fans and staffmembers to stalk and harass Brandi. The very same Leann Rimes who has been paying ROL and Celebuzz to write negative articles about Brandi, and the very same Leann Rimes who had a druken orgy with her husband’s mistress in front of the kids while Eddie watched. Leann gives stepmothers a bad name. Leann is planning on pimping out Eddie’s kids this weekend and she pays a blog to pat her on the back before she does it as if this will justify what she is doing to the boys. Poor Phil. This is what people are going to see when they see his and Leann’s name. The fact that Leann is paying blogs.

    Reply
  38. Anonymous

    “Leann paid The EvilStepmother blog to write a fluffpiece”

    Where’s the copy of the cancelled check, or a recording of a phone call, proving this?

    “who very publicly encouraged her fans and staffmembers to stalk and harass Brandi”

    Where are the written quotes proving she did this?

    “who had a druken orgy with her husband’s mistress in front of the kids while Eddie watched”

    Where are the photos of this as concrete evidence she did this?

    If I were Brandi, Leann or Eddie, I’d have hunted you down and sued you by now. You are out-and-out libeling these people and someone should take you task for it. And the obvious in-your-face stalking is downright scary.

    What is wrong with you????????
    How do you know these people’s every move???????

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      Asking for facts or rational thinking from this delusional nutcase is a fool’s errand. There are clearly some very serious mental problems going on here.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA So now you are back to calling other posters “nutcases” because once again another one of your bright ideas failed. Yes, we know that YOU clearly have some very serious mental problems, hence why you keep coming back to make 2-3 posts/day each and everyday after you lectured others on posting. You are just mad because I pointed out that you made the very same posts earlier on in this thread using a different name.

        Are you seriously going to talk about facts and rational thinking, when you make posts in response to yourself because you STILL can’t come up with anything to defend Leann? Speaking of facts and rational thinking, why do you continue to argue that other posters are posting when you are just going to be dumb enough to make the same post we all saw you make when you pulled this very same stunt in a previous thread?

        Reply
    • Anonymous

      You are your own worst enemy and you would think that by now that you would have learned your lesson considering what happened with your “bait and switch doesn’t mean…” post and the “No one cares if Leann stages photo-ops” post. So what’s next? You are going to whine because I provided actual news articles and the dates that they were written to contradict your questions?

      1) We don’t need a cancelled check or a recording to know that Leann pays blogs to write nices things about her. When a celeb tweets directly to a particular blog after that blog has written a nice story about her, then we can conclude that she is paying the blog. Leann will also post the link to the article to her twitter page even though several of her fans have declared that she doesn’t even read or pay attention to the site in question. You can tell which sites Leann has deals with because her fans will exchange tweets with those sites. Examples of how Leann pays sites to write nice things about her can be found on Exposarrazzi.

      Word is that Leann Rimes is on the evil stepmother blog making posts in support of herself.

      For those blogs that won’t cooperate and write nice things about her, this is what Leann does: “Darrell Brown Has Pushed the Wrong Jew UPDATED” from Jewish Journal(Dec 25).

      Many people on twitter and one blogger have reported that Leann has sent them Ceast and Desist letters.

      2) You know exactly where the written quotes of Leann encouraging her fans to stalk and harass Brandi can be found? If you want to play dumb then by all means go right ahead. You are only making matters worse for yourself. The quotes of Leann encouraging her fans and staffmembers to stalk and harass Brandi can be found on the twitter pages of Leann, her fans, and her staffmembers. Remember “A Portrait of Leann NoH8 Rimes Closest Friends”?

      Where can “A Portrait of Leann NoH8 Rimes Closest Friends” be found? The best place to find this article is on LynnNChicago under the thread titled Brandi Glanville vs Leann Rimes(Dec 22, 2011).

      3) There were over 50 articles written about Leann’s druken orgy with Eddie’s mistress. So why are you acting like this is the first that you have heard of this? But once again, if you want play dumb, then by all means. The photos of Leann’s drunken orgy with Eddie’s mistress can be found on various sites, here are 4 examples:

      The Dailymail: “Naugthygirl:LeAnn Rimes kisses and cavorts with female friend(as husband Eddie Cibrian looks on) (March 26)

      Taste of Country: “LeAnn Rimes Spotted Kissing Female Friend in Public”(March 28)

      Eonline: “Move Aside, Eddie Cibrian, LeAnn Rimes Is Busy Showin’ Love to a Lady”(March 26)

      SkylivingSky: “One For The Family Album” ( Mar 27, 2012

      4) Libeling Eddie and Leann? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Someone should take me to task for it? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Eddie and Leann can’t sue me for libel. Do you know why? So what we can conclude with post 9:06 is that you don’t know what libel means. HAHAHAHA It was a nice try though. Libeling Leann despite the fact that there are over hundreds of examples provided by Leann Rimes herself to support everything that we say about her? HAHAHAHAHAHA

      Seriously, you have how many accounts in Brandi’s name? You have made how many posts about Brandi in this thread alone? You come back each and everyday to make 3-6 posts/visit. And you want to lecture someone on “obvious in-your-face stalking? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      5) We know Leann’s every move for one reason and one reason only. LEANN RIMES. Leann tips off the paps and overshares on twitter. Do I need to provide the articles where several media outlets call Leann out for tipping off the paps again?

      6) The better question is what is wrong with you? You can’t possibly be this dense. What did you think you were going to accomplish with post 9:06? You just made Leann and yourself look even worse. The last time you went on a “prove it” tantrum, the article that was posted to contradict you, was used as the topic for this thread.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        So you wrote TWO novels in response to Anonymous’s request for proof… and neither of your posts provided any proof of anything you’ve said.

        “We don’t need a cancelled check or a recording to know that Leann pays blogs to write nices things about her. ” Uh… yes, yes you do. Otherwise, it’s speculation, innuendo and rumor. That’s why it’s call PROOF, it PROVES that something happened.

        F*ing nut case.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          @2:18

          HAHAHAHAHAHA Neither of the two posts proved anything that was said? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Really? HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Either you have a very severe reading comprehension problem or you are just trying to save face because your “prove it” post backfired. You asked for proof and then when given that proof, you boo hoo because someone provided the evidence and then just like we have seen you do several times in this thread alone, you argue that the proof does’t prove anything. Well one thing is forsure the person who wrote posr 2:18 is the very same person who wrote the “bait and switch does mean what that…” posts. You know the person who kept saying that bait and switch doesn’t mean what it says even after given TWO examples to contradict her. What type of person keeps arguing that the evidence used to contradict her doesn’t actually contradict her posts? A nutcase. Go ahead, google the evidence that was provided in the two posts and keep telling us that it doesn’t prove a thing.

          Anon, no dear, it wasn’t anon, it was YOU. How do we know? Because we have seen you do this how many times now? You make a statement. Someone provides the evidence to contradict you and then you whine because some did that and then try to argue that it doesn’t prove a thing. Maybe that is your problem, you don’t know what PROOF or PROVE means.

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            I asked for proof that she paid someone. Where is the proof?

          • Anonymous

            @6:52

            HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAWow, another post where you try to save face by asking for proof? Seriously? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA And after you boo hooed because someone dared to provide you with proof that you asked for, you show up today and ask for even more proof yet again? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

            You have been given ample proof of how Leann pays people and sites to write positive things about her. Even the Fox News article that was posted in this thread details how the process works. Leann sets up the staged photo-ops and then she tells the media outlets what title and write up she wants to accompany the photos. When will you learn?The more posts you make demanding to see the proof , the more it’s hurt your credibility. You call others nutcases, yet it’s you who is dumb enough to demand proof when the proof is sitting write there in your face. And then on top of that you start singing a different tune. You asked for proof that Leann paid someone? That isn’t what you said and you know that isn’t what you said. Go back and read the very first sentence of the post you made yesterday.

            You have pulled the “where is proof” stunt how many times now? And each time where did it get you? Leann pays sites to write positive things about her, and YOU are living proof of it. Leann has to be paying you because no one is going to be this dumb to keep making posts like the one that you made on Monday. It’s like Leann tells you what to say and then you just repeat it, never really thinking through what you are posting. So how many more times are you going to come back and demand a “give me the proof” post, even though the proof is right in your face?4, 5, 6, 7? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Perhaps you should learn to think for yourself instead of just repeating what Leann tells you to write.

            BTW, where is the proof that Leann doesn’t pay sites? We know based on Leann’s tweets that she pays her fans. And you want us to belive that this same thing isn’t going on with media outlets?

          • Anonymous

            To 6:52

            Thou doth protest too much. The reason you are going nuts over the comment about how Leeanne Rhimes pays people to write glowing pieces about her is because it’s true. You wouldn’t hsve reacted in this manner or continued to ask for proof(even when it’s given to you), if there was no truth in what was said. Your guilty conscience must be getting the best of you.

            YOU are the perfect example that Leeanne Rhimes pays someone. The more you post the more and more evident it becomes. I heard that you are one of the writers for this site. So you are the person Leeanne Rhimes was talking to on twitter? Do the other writers, know that Leeanne Rhimes is paying you to post in their threads in defense of her?

          • Anonymous

            Nope, this is actually what you said: “So you wrote TWO novels in response to Anonymous’s request for proof… and neither of your posts provided any proof of anything you’ve said.”

            Now why do you tell lies when we can see your posts?

          • Anonymous

            “Is LeAnn Rimes in cahoots with paparazzi who take all of those beach bikini pics?”

            NEW YORK – LeAnn Rimes has had enough photos taken of her on beaches in bikinis to star in her own calendar.

            The country music singer, much maligned for her scandalous marriage to her co-star Eddie Cibrian (they hooked up on the set of a Lifetime movie while they were married to others), may not be making much music these days, but she sure is a professional at staying in the press.

            Like clockwork new shots of Rimes frolicking on a new beach in a new bikini appear in celebrities weeklies and web sites.

            Here she is in Maui; there she is in Mexico; here she is in Malibu.

            If there’s a beach, there’s a good likelihood Rimes will be on it in a teeny weeny bikini.

            Now some industry insiders are speculating that these pics aren’t paparazzi shots at all, but that Rimes is tipping off the photographers to stage the shots, and maybe even getting a piece of the action for herself.

            The most recent pictures of Rimes and husband Eddie Cibrian looking picture perfect on a beach in Cabo San Lucas raised the eyebrows of one skeptical photo editor.

            “Those photographs came into all the magazines and websites fully captioned and saying, ‘LeeAnn Rimes on a trip to renew her vows.’ There is no vow renewing in those pictures,” the industry insider told us. “There is no way the paps would have known she was doing that unless she specifically told them.”

            “Plus the paps just don’t get access like that in Cabo,” the editor added. “They can’t get close enough to the celebrities without permission to get the quality of those photos. They were right next to her. There was no long lens. This was not intrusive in any way. This was a photo shoot.”

            Pics like these demonstrate a truth long known in the magazine industry but hidden from consumers—celebrities are often in cahoots with the paparazzi.

            Indeed the reasons celebrities hook up with the paps are many. One is to control the kinds of pictures released to the press. Some celebs believe that if they give just a little they can avoid the paparazzi snapping them unaware in an embarrassing situation.

            Another reason to hook up with the paps is to get cash, one of the dirtier little secrets of Hollywood moneymaking. Celebrities often share the proceeds from the sales of their photographs to magazines and websites with the agency that contracts the photographer taking the pictures.

            Insiders said there is a possibility that Rimes is making money off her photos, even though it wouldn’t be big time cash.

            “We see her in a bikini all the time. There is nothing news worthy about LeAnn Rimes frolicking on the beach so it isn’t a big money shot,” an editor told us.“It is the equivalent of Jennifer Garner walking down the street with a coffee or maybe just a little bit more. I would say they sell to magazines for $1,000 and to websites for $100 a piece.”

            But if those pictures are purchased by 10 magazines around the world and a hundred websites, that is still a nice chunk of change.

            But perhaps more than the money, such shots help to bolster Rimes’ somewhat tarnished brand which took a hit when she first hooked up with Cibrian while he was married to ‘Beverly Hills Real Housewife’ Brandi Glanville.

            “Her story is defined as being the girl who hooked up with her co-star when they were both married and and she stole this woman’s husband. When you see her frolicking around in the sun it sends the signal this is real relationship just like yours. Maybe it was weird how they got together but now they are just like you,” an editor told us. “There is nothing news worthy about LeeAnn Rimes frolicking on the beach but it is another reminder to anyone who will pay attention that she is happy and skinny and still married.”

            Rimes did not respond to our request for comment.

            -Source: Fox News

        • Anonymous

          To 2:18

          Wait, why does this post sound so familiar? Where I have seen this post before? That is right, you made the very same comment in the previous thread on Apr 26, @2:09 because you didn’t like the fact that someone provided evidence against you because you kept writing post after post about how no one cares that Leann’s sets up staged photo-ops. You are such a creature of habit. But it’s nice to see that when you are presented with evicence that you can’t refute, that you STILL are resorting to making a post about how the evidence doesn’t prove a thing or about how someone dared to give you the evidence that you asked for. Now that is a nutcase.

          Reply
        • Anonymous

          No wonder the Leanne fan is flipping out, Leanne set up another staged photo-op today at a grocery store in a bikini. She must really be desperate.

          Reply
    • Anonymous

      To 9:06

      This is the definition of libel: ” to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others. Libel is the written or broadcast form of defamation, distinguished from slander, which is oral defamation. It is a tort (civil wrong) making the person or entity (like a newspaper, magazine or political organization) open to a lawsuit for damages by the person who can prove the statement about him/her was a lie. ”

      1) The major problem with your logic is the fact that these are not untruths or lies, since the behavior in question is documented in tweets and photos. Now please explain how the comment about how Leann had a druken orgy with Eddie’s mistress is an untruth or lie when over 50 media outlets posted photos of Leann kissing Liz, putting her face in Liz’s breasts, touching all over Liz, and lifting up her shirt as Liz stood behind her? In the photos from each and every site you can clearly see the bottles of alcohol on the balcony railing. Liz is holding a whine glass in her hand.

      2) The other major problem with your logic is that this information has been provided to the internet, blogs, tabloids, tv shows, and etc…by LEANN RIMES. People are simply providing feedback on the tweets and staged photo-ops that she broadcasted to the world.

      3) Leann is her own worst enemy. She knows that she isn’t going to get positive feedback and yet she continues to do the same thing over and over.

      Reply
  39. Anonymous

    Leanne Rhimes is posting as AnonThisTime on The Evil Stepmother Speaks. She was even bragging on that site about how she forced the owner of The Evil Stepmother Speaks to delete several comments to hide the fact that people were on to her.

    Reply
  40. Anonymous

    To the “neither of your posts provided any proof of anything you’ve said” poster:

    This is speculation, innuendo, and rumor?

    1) Evidence of Leann’s deals with blogs:

    LEANN’s tweets.

    Since Leann is in cahoots with the paps( see Fox News article), then we know that she is in cahoots with media outlets like ROL, DM, JJ, x17, People mag, Celebuzz, and Eonline. She even gives these sites “exclusive” interviews. Leann links the articles to her twitter page. Her fans will even advertise for these sites.

    2) Evidence of Leann attempting to bully people on twitter into supporting her:

    A BB reported that she received a phone call from Leann in which Leann attempted to convince her that Brandi was a mean person.

    3) Leann sending several people on twitter, including Brandi, a C & D because they didn’t write or say nice things about her.

    Eonline: “LeAnn Rimes Attempts to Shut Up Eddie Cibrian’s Ex” (May 28, 2010)

    Aceshowbuz: “LeAnn Rimes Takes Legal Action to Silence Eddie Cibrian’s Estranged Wife”(May 29, 2010)

    4) Evidence of Leann trying to bully bloggers who won’t write nice things about her via DB.

    From the Jewish Journal: “Darrell Brown Has Pushed the Wrong Jew UPDATED” (Dec 25).

    A radio DJ criticized Leann for canceling a concert, and what did Leann do? She got on twitter and said that she was going to have her people call the radio station and talk to the DJ boss.

    5) Evidence of Leann encougaring her fans, friends, and staffmembers to harass and stalk Brandi.

    From LynnNChicago( Brandi Glanville vs Leann Rimes(Dec 22, 2011): “A Portrait of Leann NoH8 Rimes Closest Friends”

    This can also be found on the timelines of the BBs.

    6) Evidence of Leann’s drunken orgy with Eddie’s mistress:

    The Dailymail: “Naugthygirl:LeAnn Rimes kisses and cavorts with female friend(as husband Eddie Cibrian looks on) (March 26)

    Taste of Country: “LeAnn Rimes Spotted Kissing Female Friend in Public”(March 28)

    Eonline: “Move Aside, Eddie Cibrian, LeAnn Rimes Is Busy Showin’ Love to a Lady”(March 26)

    SkylivingSky: “One For The Family Album” ( Mar 27, 2012

    7) This is the definition of libel: ” to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others. Libel is the written or broadcast form of defamation, distinguished from slander, which is oral defamation. It is a tort (civil wrong) making the person or entity (like a newspaper, magazine or political organization) open to a lawsuit for damages by the person who can prove the statement about him/her was a lie. ”

    Once again, when the behavior in question is documented in a staged photo-op or by Leann’s own tweets, it’s not an untruth or lie.

    8) The defintion of speculation: guess, a message expressing an opinion based on incomplete evidence.

    Once again the behavior in question has been documented by Leann’s tweets and staged photo-ops, so it’s not a guess or incomplete evidence.

    9) rumor: a piece of unverified information of uncertain origin usually spread by word of mouth.

    Once again Leann Rimes verifies the behavior in question via her staged photo-ops and tweets, so it’s not a rumor.

    10)innuendo: an indirect implication, often malicious or improper

    Once again, the evidence is provided by LEANN RIMES via her staged photo-ops and tweets.

    So what we can conclude is that you don’t know what speculation, innuendo, and rumor mean. I love when Leann’s fans make posts like 2:18 because it just demonstrates just how dense they truly are. Considering what happened the last time she attempted to pull this same stunt with posts May6@11:23/May7@11:48/May7@6:19 in this thread and in the previous thread when you made posts Apr 25@5:38, Apr24@10:41, Apr26@2:09, Apr28@12:44, Apr28@8:15, May2@3:08, May3@7:28, May3@7:25.

    So Let’s see how many times she will come back and make a post screaming that the evidence doesn’t say what it says!!!!

    Reply
  41. Anonymous

    Eleventy gazillion more posts… and still no proof. Not surprised.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      You demand that people give you proof and then when they do you whine by arguing that it’s too much information?HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Another “you have no proof” post? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Why am I not surprised? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Are you trying to save face, have a severe comprehension problem, or just upset because we hit the nail on the head? You have taken offense to the comment that Leann pays people because YOU are being paid by Leann. You came back and made another “there is still no proof” post, so that is proof enough that LEANN RIMES pays people to write nice things about her!! Only a person who is being paid by LEANN RIMES would be dumb enough to keeping making posts such as May 30, 2012 @ 06:27 pm
      , May 29, 2012 @ 06:52 pm, May 28, 2012 @ 02:18 pm, May 25, 2012 @ 03:58 pm, and May 25, 2012 @ 09:06 am.

      HAHAHAHA Wait, what? YOU are not surprised? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA YOU the same person who earlier on in this thread kept writing post after post about how “bait and switch” didn’t mean what it meant despite the fact that you were given TWO forms of evidence to contradict you, isn’t surprised( SEE posts May 7, 2012 @ 06:19 pm, May 7, 2012 @ 11:48 am, May 6, 2012 @ 11:23 pm)? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Seeing as how you came back and wrote yet another “there is still no proof” post when you have been supplied with over 10 examples of proof contradicting your every word, there isn’t very much that surprises you. So let’s see, that makes how many “there is no proof” posts, so far? FOUR? HAHAHAHAHA And you have the audacity to say that you are not surprised? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Thanks for being the living and breathing proof that LEANN RIMES pays people to write nice things about her. You really should learn to think for yourself, instead of just posting exactly what Leann tells you. But then again if you did that, Leann won’t pay you. Eleventy gazillion more “there is no proof” posts from you…and as usual you just proved that it’s been you (THE ONE LEANN FAN) the entire time posing as mutiple posters. Post 6:27 is very similar to the post you made in the previous thread on Apr 26, @2:09.

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      That’s odd because your very own peers thought that the Fox article was sufficient proof, so much so that they posted the article as a topic for Leann’s staged photo-op with Brandi’s child:

      “Is LeAnn Rimes in cahoots with paparazzi who take all of those beach bikini pics?”

      NEW YORK – LeAnn Rimes has had enough photos taken of her on beaches in bikinis to star in her own calendar.

      The country music singer, much maligned for her scandalous marriage to her co-star Eddie Cibrian (they hooked up on the set of a Lifetime movie while they were married to others), may not be making much music these days, but she sure is a professional at staying in the press.

      Like clockwork new shots of Rimes frolicking on a new beach in a new bikini appear in celebrities weeklies and web sites.

      Here she is in Maui; there she is in Mexico; here she is in Malibu.

      If there’s a beach, there’s a good likelihood Rimes will be on it in a teeny weeny bikini.

      Now some industry insiders are speculating that these pics aren’t paparazzi shots at all, but that Rimes is tipping off the photographers to stage the shots, and maybe even getting a piece of the action for herself.

      The most recent pictures of Rimes and husband Eddie Cibrian looking picture perfect on a beach in Cabo San Lucas raised the eyebrows of one skeptical photo editor.

      “Those photographs came into all the magazines and websites fully captioned and saying, ‘LeeAnn Rimes on a trip to renew her vows.’ There is no vow renewing in those pictures,” the industry insider told us. “There is no way the paps would have known she was doing that unless she specifically told them.”

      “Plus the paps just don’t get access like that in Cabo,” the editor added. “They can’t get close enough to the celebrities without permission to get the quality of those photos. They were right next to her. There was no long lens. This was not intrusive in any way. This was a photo shoot.”

      Pics like these demonstrate a truth long known in the magazine industry but hidden from consumers—celebrities are often in cahoots with the paparazzi.

      Indeed the reasons celebrities hook up with the paps are many. One is to control the kinds of pictures released to the press. Some celebs believe that if they give just a little they can avoid the paparazzi snapping them unaware in an embarrassing situation.

      Another reason to hook up with the paps is to get cash, one of the dirtier little secrets of Hollywood moneymaking. Celebrities often share the proceeds from the sales of their photographs to magazines and websites with the agency that contracts the photographer taking the pictures.

      Insiders said there is a possibility that Rimes is making money off her photos, even though it wouldn’t be big time cash.

      “We see her in a bikini all the time. There is nothing news worthy about LeAnn Rimes frolicking on the beach so it isn’t a big money shot,” an editor told us.“It is the equivalent of Jennifer Garner walking down the street with a coffee or maybe just a little bit more. I would say they sell to magazines for $1,000 and to websites for $100 a piece.”

      But if those pictures are purchased by 10 magazines around the world and a hundred websites, that is still a nice chunk of change.

      But perhaps more than the money, such shots help to bolster Rimes’ somewhat tarnished brand which took a hit when she first hooked up with Cibrian while he was married to ‘Beverly Hills Real Housewife’ Brandi Glanville.

      “Her story is defined as being the girl who hooked up with her co-star when they were both married and and she stole this woman’s husband. When you see her frolicking around in the sun it sends the signal this is real relationship just like yours. Maybe it was weird how they got together but now they are just like you,” an editor told us. “There is nothing news worthy about LeeAnn Rimes frolicking on the beach but it is another reminder to anyone who will pay attention that she is happy and skinny and still married.”

      Rimes did not respond to our request for comment.

      -Source: Fox News

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        The only thing you have proved is that you have no problem violating copyright law by reposting entire articles that you do not own.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Wow, another “you didn’t prove anything” post? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH That makes what now? FIVE? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Thanks for once again proving that YOU are being paid by Leann because only a person who is being paid by Leann would be dumb enough to make yet another “you didn’t prove anything” post. So basically what you are saying is that you took offense with the Leann pays people to write nice things about her because you are being paid.

          Once again you need to think before you post instead of just repeating the things that Leann tells you. Here is the major flaws in your logic.

          1) The author of this site posted the same article. So then by your logic you are saying that the writer and this site also violated the copyright law?

          2) This article was posted in the previous thread in response to you, if the authors thought that it violated the copyright law, then why did they REPOST the article and make it a topic for this thread? Surely they are aware of the copyright laws.

          3) Why hasn’t the article been removed?

          4)We have seen you repost negative articles about Brandi on various sites, so where was your concern for the copyright laws then? You have even made posts in Brandi’s name. If you weren’t concerned about making posts in Brandi’s name, then we know that you are not concerned about copyright laws.

          5) The source of the article was acknowledged.

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            You know nothing about copyright law and you are flat-out wrong (as usual). You might want to do a little reading about copyright law as you are just making a fool of yourself (even more than you already have, I mean). You should start off with the term “fair use”. Posting of snippets, or short excerpts, as this site does, is legal. Posting the entire content of an article is copyright infringement. There is no dispute about this. And acknowledging the source does not matter – that does not absolve you of the violation. It’s only a defense against an accusation of plagiarism, which is not the same thing as copyright.

          • Anonymous

            Wow, why does this post sound so familiar? That’s right, you made similar posts on May 7, 2012 @ 11:48 am and May 7, 2012 @ 06:19 pm
            when you were trying to argue that “bait and switch” didn’t mean what it meant. How did that work out for you? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA If I was flat out wrong or making a fool of myself, why then did you show up with a different name? You are pulling the very same stunt that backfired on you several weeks ago. So that means it’s you who is making a fool of yourself.

            You know nothing about copyright law and you are flat-out wrong (as usual). You might want to do a little reading about copyright law as you are just making a fool of yourself (even more than you already have, I mean). You should start off with the term “fair use”, and don’t just read the first paragraph of whatever website you googled. Actually go through and READ the entire document. There are other

            Once again you need to think before you post instead of just repeating the things that Leann tells you. Here is the major flaws in your logic.

            1) The author of this site posted the same article. So then by your logic you are saying that the writer and this site also violated the copyright law?

            2) This article was posted in the previous thread in response to you, if the authors thought that the article that was posted in the previous thread violated the copyright law, then why did they REPOST the article and make it a topic for this thread? Why is the article STILL there? Surely they are aware of the copyright laws.

            3) Why hasn’t the article been removed?

            4)We have seen you repost negative articles(ie-the entire content of an article; not just snippets, short excerpts) about Brandi on various sites, so where was your concern for the copyright laws then? You have even made posts in Brandi’s name. If you weren’t concerned about making posts in Brandi’s name, then we know that you are not concerned about copyright laws.

            Why the double standard? And then you think that you can justify your use of entire articles by lecturing others on how they shouldn’t use the “everybody is doing it” card?

            5) The source of the article was acknowledged.

            6) This article was posted in the previous thread, and not once did you say or mention anyting about copyright infringement. So why now are you concerned about copyright infringements?

            7) “[A] reviewer may fairly cite largely from the original work, if his design be really and truly to use the passages for the purposes of fair and reasonable criticism. On the other hand, it is as clear, that if he thus cites the most important parts of the work, with a view, not to criticize, but to supersede the use of the original work, and substitute the review for it, such a use will be deemed in law a piracy…In short, we must often… look to the nature and objects of the selections made, the quantity and value of the materials used, and the degree in which the use may prejudice the sale, or diminish the profits, or supersede the objects, of the original work.”

          • Anonymous

            I love when the “bait and “switch” doesn’t mean what it means poster tries to sound clever!!!

            So then based on the post you made at 9:13 today, the post that you made at 9:57 qualifies as a manicial tangent.

            Why don’t you take your own advice?

            “Instead of accepting defeat, you went off on a manical tangent (of course) without ever offering any proof on that one iem. Not copy right infringements, not fair use, just that.one.item.”

          • Anonymous

            You didn’t do your homework. Because if you had, you wouldn’t be sitting here trying to argue that FAIR USE is soley defined by how much of the article that is used. Posting the entire portion of an article isn’t copyright infringement, because there are other factors.

            “In short, we must often… look to the nature and objects of the selections made, the quantity and value of the materials used, and the degree in which the use may prejudice the sale, or diminish the profits, or supersede the objects, of the original work.”

          • Anonymous

            To the Leeanne Rhimes “copyright infringement” fan:

            There are 4 factors of analysis for fair use, not 1.

            1) purpose; is it commericial or nonprofit
            2) nature
            3) amount of material used
            4) effect that using the material will have on the value of the article

            If you are going to tell someone that they are wrong and making a fool of themselves, shouldn’t you at least know what you are talking about? How are you going to tell someone about fair use when you didn’t know that there were 4 factors?

          • Anonymous

            It’s called keeping things simple, both for the sake of someone who neither argues honestly nor has functioning analytical skills, as well as for the fact that unlike a certain person, I don’t have time to write an epic novel every time I post. The fair use comments were in reference to what this site does when quoting articles, in order to counter the nutcase’s claims that this site was also posting articles (never mind the fact that even if they were, it’s irrelevant). I didn’t go through the fine points of fair use doctrine because it was unnecessary for the point I was making (which apparently sailed right over your head). I guarantee you I do know what I’m talking about, and I guarantee you posting the entire text of the article is in fact copyright infringement. That doesn’t mean Fox will ever come after this person or after this site – they have much bigger fish to fry. But just because you can get away with something, and just because lots of people get away with it, doesn’t mean you didn’t break the rules. Many sites do in fact do have policies against posting the full text of articles in their comments precisely because they don’t want to get hit with copyright claims (which some have). This site obviously doesn’t care.

            And please, I am no Leann Rimes fan. What I am is pro-calling-out-dishonest-nutcases.

          • Anonymous

            HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Since you are pulling the very same stunt that you did when you tried to argue that “bait and switch” didn’t mean what it meant, the fine points are sailing over YOUR head. After that whole thing blew up in your face, you then come back and do the very same thing today? HAHAHAHAHA You have used over 6 different names in this thread alone, when you can’t come up with anything valid you resort to name calling(ie-nutcase, kooky mckooky, etc…), and you try to give your posts credibility by writing words of support in a different name, and you claim that it’s others who aren’t arguing honestly?

            Based on the post that you left at 9am, everyone can see that you didn’t go through the fine points of the fair use doctrine and that you lack functioning analytical skills. You went to a site, googled fair use, and only read the first line of whatever website you visited. You came here and made the post about fair use, only to make yourself look like the nutcase because you didn’t even know that fair use was based on 4 FACTORS. And then when called on it, you attempt to save face by making excuses and name calling. So I guarantee you, that YOU do not know what you are talking about because if you did, you wouldn’t keep arguing that posting the entire article is copyright infringement or against the law when there are 3 other factors that must be analyzed or you try to redeem yourself by claiming that you didn’t mention the other 3 factors because they are not relevant. You keep saying that posting the entire article is against the law, but not according to the factors of the fair use doctrine. So you don’t know what you are talking about.

            1) If many sites have policies against posting full text articles in their comments, then how did you get away with posting the full text articles about Brandi on those other sites? Because Leann is paying those sites or you wrong yet again? So the next time that you post the full text article about Brandi on all those other many sites, try to remember that just because you can get away with something, and just because lots of people get away with it, doesn’t mean you didn’t break the rules.

            2) You are always making excuses. No matter how you spin it, if this site thought that the article was a copyright infringement it would have been gone by now. So if Fox News is too busy to go after the smaller fish, why then are you making such a big deal about copyright infringement? Because this isn’t about copyright infringement. You are just upset because the article contains proof that you can’t refute.

            3) It’s called keeping things simple? No it’s not. It’s called you didn’t do your homework and now you are embrasssed because your plan backfired. Which is why you are trying to fix this by claiming that the other 3 factors are not relevant, even though you still are claiming that just posting the entire article is against the law.

            4) pro-calling-out-dishonest-nutcases? The only nutcase is YOU. You weren’t concerned about copyright infringements in the previous thread. So why don’t you just be honest with yourself what this is all about.

            5) You are a Leann Rimes fan. Seriously, every post that you have made this week has been linked back to a post that you made earlier on in this thread or in the previous threads, yet you still come back and make the very same posts over and over again like no one is going to notice. You don’t have time to make an epic novel, yet here you visit this site 2-3 times each and everyday posting 2-7 times everytime you visit. And yet you want to call others nutcases and claim that it’s others who don’t have functioning analytical skills?

          • Anonymous

            To the Leeanne Rhimes fan who is now tryying to pass herself as a ” pro-calling-out-dishonest-nutcases”, even though she is the nutcase:

            The other 3 factors are are irrelevant? Go do your homework instead of making excuses for yourself. According to this, ALL 4 of the factors are RELEVANT and if there was that much weight given to the amount of an article that was posted, that would be the very first thing mentioned:

            “In short, we must often… look to the nature and objects of the selections made, the quantity and value of the materials used, and the degree in which the use may prejudice the sale, or diminish the profits, or supersede the objects, of the original work.”

          • Anonymous

            To the Leeanne Rhimes “copyright infringement” fan:

            There are 4 factors of analysis for fair use, not 1.

            1) purpose; is it commericial or nonprofit
            2) nature
            3) amount of material used
            4) effect that using the material will have on the value of the article

            If you are going to tell someone that they are wrong and making a fool of themselves, shouldn’t you at least know what you are talking about? How are you going to tell someone about fair use when you didn’t know that there were 4 factors? If the other factors are not relevant like you claim or you knew what you were talking about why are you still saying that posting the entire article is breaking the rules?

          • Anonymous

            “In short, we must often… look to the nature and objects of the selections made, the quantity and value of the materials used, and the degree in which the use may prejudice the sale, or diminish the profits, or supersede the objects, of the original work.”

          • Anonymous

            Why does this post that was made today at 3:46 pm
            look awfully similiar to the post that was made on May 7, 2012 @ 11:48 am? Now isn’t that arguing dishonestly? Come on, TRUE or FALSE. Are you the very same person who made the post on May 7, 2012 @11:48?

          • Anonymous

            And, I should also add, “other people do it too” is not a valid defense to breaking the law. If you think it is, you should try that next time you get pulled over for speeding. I’m sure the cop will totally agree with you.

          • Anonymous

            Says the poster who has on several occasions attempted to justifiy Leann’s affair with Eddie and Leann’s staged photo-ops with Brandi’s kids by using the “other people do it too” defense. So the next time you attempt to justify Leann’s staged photo-ops with Brandi’s kids or her affair with Eddie, please remember your own words: “other people do it too” is not a valid defense to breaking the law. If you think it is, you should try that next time you get pulled over for speeding. I’m sure the cop will totally agree with you.”

            This is too funny, you are going on and on about violating copyright laws when you were whining earlier about manical tangents! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA This isn’t about copyright laws, you are just upset because obviously the Fox News article was the perfect evidence against you.

          • Anonymous

            @ 12:42

            So then based on the post you made at 9:13 today, the post that you made at 12:42 qualifies as a manicial tangent.

            Why don’t you take your own advice?

            “Instead of accepting defeat, you went off on a manical tangent (of course) without ever offering any proof on that one iem. Not copy right infringements, not fair use, just that.one.item.”

        • Anonymous

          The only thing you have proved is that you have no problem providing evidence that LEANN RIMES is paying you to write these posts!

          So if this article violated copyright laws, why then did this site REPOST the article, which was orginally posted in the previous thread?

          “Is LeAnn Rimes in cahoots with paparazzi who take all of those beach bikini pics?”

          NEW YORK – LeAnn Rimes has had enough photos taken of her on beaches in bikinis to star in her own calendar.

          The country music singer, much maligned for her scandalous marriage to her co-star Eddie Cibrian (they hooked up on the set of a Lifetime movie while they were married to others), may not be making much music these days, but she sure is a professional at staying in the press.

          Like clockwork new shots of Rimes frolicking on a new beach in a new bikini appear in celebrities weeklies and web sites.

          Here she is in Maui; there she is in Mexico; here she is in Malibu.

          If there’s a beach, there’s a good likelihood Rimes will be on it in a teeny weeny bikini.

          Now some industry insiders are speculating that these pics aren’t paparazzi shots at all, but that Rimes is tipping off the photographers to stage the shots, and maybe even getting a piece of the action for herself.

          The most recent pictures of Rimes and husband Eddie Cibrian looking picture perfect on a beach in Cabo San Lucas raised the eyebrows of one skeptical photo editor.

          “Those photographs came into all the magazines and websites fully captioned and saying, ‘LeeAnn Rimes on a trip to renew her vows.’ There is no vow renewing in those pictures,” the industry insider told us. “There is no way the paps would have known she was doing that unless she specifically told them.”

          “Plus the paps just don’t get access like that in Cabo,” the editor added. “They can’t get close enough to the celebrities without permission to get the quality of those photos. They were right next to her. There was no long lens. This was not intrusive in any way. This was a photo shoot.”

          Pics like these demonstrate a truth long known in the magazine industry but hidden from consumers—celebrities are often in cahoots with the paparazzi.

          Indeed the reasons celebrities hook up with the paps are many. One is to control the kinds of pictures released to the press. Some celebs believe that if they give just a little they can avoid the paparazzi snapping them unaware in an embarrassing situation.

          Another reason to hook up with the paps is to get cash, one of the dirtier little secrets of Hollywood moneymaking. Celebrities often share the proceeds from the sales of their photographs to magazines and websites with the agency that contracts the photographer taking the pictures.

          Insiders said there is a possibility that Rimes is making money off her photos, even though it wouldn’t be big time cash.

          “We see her in a bikini all the time. There is nothing news worthy about LeAnn Rimes frolicking on the beach so it isn’t a big money shot,” an editor told us.“It is the equivalent of Jennifer Garner walking down the street with a coffee or maybe just a little bit more. I would say they sell to magazines for $1,000 and to websites for $100 a piece.”

          But if those pictures are purchased by 10 magazines around the world and a hundred websites, that is still a nice chunk of change.

          But perhaps more than the money, such shots help to bolster Rimes’ somewhat tarnished brand which took a hit when she first hooked up with Cibrian while he was married to ‘Beverly Hills Real Housewife’ Brandi Glanville.

          “Her story is defined as being the girl who hooked up with her co-star when they were both married and and she stole this woman’s husband. When you see her frolicking around in the sun it sends the signal this is real relationship just like yours. Maybe it was weird how they got together but now they are just like you,” an editor told us. “There is nothing news worthy about LeeAnn Rimes frolicking on the beach but it is another reminder to anyone who will pay attention that she is happy and skinny and still married.”

          Rimes did not respond to our request for comment.

          -Source: Fox News

          Reply
  42. KatieG

    The Anonymous poster from the other day asked you (Kooky McKook) for proof that “Leann paid The EvilStepmother blog to write a fluffpiece”.

    Instead of answering that one specific item, you went off on a manical tangent (of course) without ever offering any proof on that item. Not bikini photos, not staged photo shoots, just that.one.item.

    I predict you’ll do it again now.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      So based on the post that you made at 9:13, we can conclude that either you have a severe reading comprehension problem or you are just trying to save face because your guilty conscience is getting the best of you(you are only taking offense to the comment that Leann pays sites to post nice things about her because YOU are being paid by Leann).

      You try so hard to sound clever and as always it just backfires on you, very badly.Let’s break it down since you are too dense for your own good. I am valid in using the Fox article as evidence because: Since Leann sets up deals with the paps, then we know that she is paying and setting up deals with sites like The Evil StepMother Blog who are posting the photos.

      The article even states that much when they wrote: “Those photographs came into all the magazines and websites fully captioned and saying, ‘LeeAnn Rimes on a trip to renew her vows.’ There is no vow renewing in those pictures,” the industry insider told us. “There is no way the paps would have known she was doing that unless she specifically told them.”

      Now what do you think this means? There is flow of information between the paps and the websites who are posting the photos and writing the fluffpieces about Leann, and it orginates with LEANN RIMES.

      If Leann is paying the paps to take photos of her, then we know that she is paying sites to write things about her.

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      Says the poster who has now made SIX “you didn’t prove anything” posts despite the fact that she was offered over 10 examples and who is now pretending to be a “different” poster to add crediblity to your posts. If you want to talk about going off on a manical tangent(of course), then let’s talk about your “you are violating copyright law” posts. If I didn’t offer any proof on that item about how Leann pays sites to post positive things about her, why are you screaming about copyright laws now, especially when you had nothing to say in the previous thread about them?

      Wow, another “you didn’t prove anything” post? Why am I not surprised. HAHAHAHA what is that now? SIX? HAHAHAHAHAH And this time you used a name to make it seem like other posters agree and support you since your other FIVE “you didn’t prove anything” posts backfired. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA But wait, not just any name. I must have struck a nerve because why did you show up with a “different name”?

      Anonymous poster? That anonymous poster was YOU. How do we know? You established that you are KatieG when you showed up and posted as KatieA, Katie B, and Katie C on May 19, 2012, stating that you can use any name that you like. What also hurts your agrument is the fact that post 9:13 is very similar to the post that you made on May 28, 2012 @ 02:18 pm. Thanks for being a creature of habit. Yesterday you showed up around 9 am to make a “you didn’t prove anything” post too. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Funny that you would used the word manical, because you also used “manically” when you posted on May 21 at 9:08 am.

      The one item that proves that Leann pays sites to write nice things about her is YOU. Only a person who is being paid by Leann Rimes would be dumb enough to make another post about how there is no proof. I predict you’ll do it again now because what seems to matter most to you is Leann’s money, rather than common sense.

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      To the” you didn’t prove anyting” poster:

      Actually this is what you asked: “Where’s the copy of the cancelled check, or a recording of a phone call, proving this?”

      And then you might want to check out the post that you made on May 28 @ 2:18.

      You attempt to sound so clever, but in the end you just make matters only worse for yourself. Why are you always rewriting history?

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      KatieG=KTGrace?

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      Kooky McKook? Why does that sound so familiar? Because you made the very same post on May 7, 2012 @ 02:29 pm when you were posting as ANONYMOUS. So then you, KATIEG, have been posting in this thread along as anonymous. So why today did you decide to use a name? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Talk about manical tangents. With one post you once again confirm what I have been saying all along. Why would you post as ANONYMOUS and then come back the very next day posting as a different poster? HAHAHAHAHA You are your own worst enemy. Did you really think that you were fooling everyone?

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      Where did you pick up the word “kooky” from? Are you stalking the twitter page of a particular BB(HINT: AB)?

      Reply
  43. Anonymous

    No wonder the Leeanne Rhimes fan is freaking out this week about how Leeanne Rhimes pays websites to post nice things about her. Leeanne Rhimes is gearing up to exploit her other stepson on his birthday. Just like she did with the younger boy on his birthday, she is on twitter, making his birthay all about her. So this is why someone has been showing up each and everyday saying that there is no proof that Leeann Rhimes pays websites because Leeanne Rhimes negotiated with several websites to get “candid” photos of her and her stepson “celebrating” his birthday? Seriously, how low can Leeanne stoop? So can we guess which site is going to be the first to post the photos of Leeanne Rhimes exploiting her stepson on his birthday?

    Reply
  44. Anonymous

    So now the Leeanne fan has moved from writing posts about how there isn’t any proof to writing posts about how the evidence used to contradict her is a copyright infringement? Who is advising her and Leeanne?

    Reply
  45. Anonymous

    “In short, we must often… look to the nature and objects of the selections made, the quantity and value of the materials used, and the degree in which the use may prejudice the sale, or diminish the profits, or supersede the objects, of the original work.”

    Reply
  46. Anonymous

    Wow. Just wow.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      So now you are posting at 7am instead of 9am? So now you, the Leeanne fan, have gone full circle and is back to making sarcastic remarks? How does it work again? Name calling. Nasty comments about Brandi. Use 5 different names. More name calling. Prove it posts. Denial posts. Even more name calling. And then when all else fails. Sarcasm. In your case, wow, just, wow is an appropriate response. I love how you take breaks for the holiday and then come back and resume your job here on this site.

      Reply
      • Anonymous

        What the hell are you rating about?

        Reply
      • Anonymous

        “Wow. Just wow.” is sarcastic?? On what planet?? Maybe on Planet Kooky McKook!

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA So you are still playing dumb? You were being sarcastic. We have seen you do this how many times now? You have no one to blame but yourself. You pull this in EVERY thread and you even pulled the sarcasm card earlier on in this thread, so there are other posts that we can compare this one to. You do realize that those posts are still there, right? Only a person who is being paid by Leann Rimes would be dumb enough to come back and make a post like 5:21.

          Seriously, do you have a reading comprehension problem, only see what you want to see, or once again you trying to save face by playing dumb or denying what is so obvious to everyone else? Well one thing is for sure, you do this so often that everyone is able to recognize your pattern of behavior. You made the comment earlier on in this thread as anon and people still knew it was you. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Is that why you are really upset?

          Kooky McKook: When you show up posting as KATIEG one day and then turn around the next day and pretend to be a completely different poster by posting as anonymous.

          So where did you come across the word kooky? Did you pick it up from one of the BBs you were stalking on twitter(HINT:AB)?

          Reply
        • Anonymous

          Thanks for admitting that KATIEG has been posting as anonymous this entire time!!! You spent all that time in the previous thread arguing that there were thousands and thousands of other posters making comments in these threads, only to ruin it by making posts Jun 1, 2012 @ 05:21 pm
          , May 31, 2012 @ 09:13 am, May 7, 2012 @ 02:29 pm in this thread and several other times in the previous threads just like it. You might want to think before you post. It would save you the embarassment and humiliation.

          Reply
        • Anonymous

          You have absolutely no clue, at all, why anyone would think that the post that you made on Thursday morning was a sarcastic remark? No clue at all?

          Well first of all, you have made the “wow, just wow” post in previous threads. Did you forget that you made those posts?

          Secondly we know that you were being sarcastic because you did the very same thing when you made the following posts in this thread:

          May 8, 2012 @ 10:46 am
          May 14, 2012 @ 04:22 pm
          May 15, 2012 @ 04:56 pm
          May 15, 2012 @ 04:57 pm
          May 18, 2012 @ 09:45 am
          May 18, 2012 @ 09:48 am
          May 18, 2012 @ 02:29 pm
          May 18, 2012 @ 05:52 pm

          Reply
  47. Anonymous

    Once again, a 400-word response to a 10-word post. I truly feel sorry for you.

    It’s all good. This post has more than 200 responses, so my work here is done.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      Yeah, yeah, yeah, we have heard this all before from you. The fact of the matter is that you are just trying to save face. You ask for proof and then when you can’t come up with anything to refute the proof that was provided, you whine about how the evidence is too much.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA The person who argued that “bait and switch” didn’t mean what it meant, even though she was provided with TWO examples to contradict her, feels sorry for me? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH The person who tried to school someone on copyright infringement and didn’t even know that there 4 FOUR factors of analysis, feels sorry for me? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA The person who showed up one day as anonymous and then the very next day as KatieG to give her “you didn’t prove anything” posts credibility, feels sorry for me? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA The person who is now in the Gisele thread throwing a tantrum about what is going on in this thread because she didn’t get her way, feels sorry for me? Considering how you came back today and made the very same post that you made on May 28, 2012 @ 02:18 pm and May 30, 2012 @ 06:27 pm in this thread and Apr 26, @2:09 in the previous thread, it’s apparent to everyone that it’s yourself you feel sorry for. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Considering how you are in the Gisele thread pulling the very same stunt we have seen you do over and over, yeah, it’s obvious that it’s yourself you feel sorry for.

      So the person who made post 4:38 also made posts May 18, 2012 @ 02:29 pm and May 18, 2012 @ 02:29 pm. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA So now you are back to the “Leann is popular because she has over 100 posts” card? That worked wonders for you and Leann when you pulled the very same stunt in January, right? How many posts was in that thread? Over 200 posts. Oh wait. Getting over 200 posts in a thread didn’t work wonders for Leann did it. In fact it all backfired because people heard about what you were writing in these threads and the backlash against Leann got worse. So even after getting over 200 posts, Leann was still disliked and not popular. There goes your theory. So based on how this concept backfired when you pulled the very same stunt in January, your work isn’t done, now is it? HAHAHAHAHAHA

      If your work is done why are you in a completely different thread that has nothing to do with Leann trying to cause trouble? We can always tell when things are bad for you because you go to another thread and write posts about other posters, like you did when you went to the Jeffrey Dean Morgan thread and in the Patrick S thread. What was the outcome when you did what you did in those threads? Your posts were deleted. Your work is done and yet there you are in another thread throwing a tantrum, stalking and harassing other posters?

      Reply
    • Anonymous

      What do these following threads all have in common?

      The Bündchen-Brady Bunch: Park Playdate(June 1)
      Patrick Schwarzenegger Feels Good After Skiing Injury(March 13, 2012)
      The Kardashian Clan Attend Church(Feb 6)
      Jeffrey Dean Morgan & Family Stroll Though LAX(Jan 16, 2012)
      Ellen Pompeo & Stella Enjoy An Aquarium Adventure (Jan 6)

      The 3 things that these following threads have in common are:

      1) NYCMommy/Janna(aka YOU) is posting in the thread

      2) An “anon” poster(aka YOU) who shows up in the thread that has nothing to do with Leann Rimes before or after NYCMommy/Janna makes a post, who makes a statement like this “Like the Leann Rimes stalker in the other thread!!”. Sometimes if we are lucky the anon poster will make a response to herself to make it look like other posters agree with her, just like we have witnessed in this thread.

      3) This incident happens when Camp Leann feels that they have lost the battle. It’s their last resort.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>